Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23160960›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2012

Understanding gender differences in statin use among elderly Medicare beneficiaries: an application of decomposition technique.

Sandipan Bhattacharjee, Patricia A Findley, Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Statin Adherence: Does Gender Matter?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Ischemic heart disease in women: a focus on risk factors.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandipan BhattacharjeeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center (North), P.O. Box 9510, Morgantown, WV 26506-9510, USA. sbhattacharjee@hsc.wvu.edu
Patricia A Findley
Usha Sambamoorthi
West Virginia University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacotherapy with statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) is the cornerstone for lipid management in individuals with or at risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Although the clinical benefits of statins are established for both women and men, there is evidence of a gender difference in their use. The current study extends prior scientific research by estimating the extent to which individual-level variables may explain gender differences in statin use by using a post-regression non-linear decomposition technique.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to estimate the magnitude of gender differences in statin use among the elderly and examine individual-level variables that can explain the gender differences in statin use among elderly individuals with or at risk of cardiovascular diseases.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study design was adopted. Data were derived from the 2005 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries in the US. The analytic study sample consisted of community-dwelling elderly Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 years or older, who had reported any of the following conditions: heart disease, hyperlipidaemia or diabetes mellitus, and who were alive during the observation year. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the unadjusted associations between gender and statin use for each of the characteristics. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the relationship between gender and statin use. A post-regression non-linear decomposition approach was used to understand individual-level variables that could explain gender differences in statin use.

resultsAmong 5,508 elderly, 47.2% of the women and 55.5% of the men reported any statin use in 2005, which translates to an 8.3 percentage point difference in statin use. In the multivariate logistic regression on statin use, women were 21% less likely than men to use statins (adjusted odds ratio = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.89). Post-regression non-linear decomposition analysis revealed that of the 8.3 percentage point difference in statin use, 29.5% was explained by the individual-level variables. Lifestyle risk factors accounted for most of the explained portion of the gender difference in statin use.

conclusionsAmong elderly Medicare beneficiaries, women were less likely than men to report any use of statins. Less than one third of the total gender difference in statin use was attributed to individual-level variables such as demographics, economic status, physical health status, depression and lifestyle risk factors. Further research is needed to identify whether provider and/or organizational-level factors can further explain the gender difference in statin use.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overData CollectionDemographyDepressionFemaleHealthHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLife StyleMaleMedicareRisk FactorsSex DistributionSocial ClassStatistics as TopicHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23160960
OpenAlexW1483043653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.