Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23160818›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2013

Metabolic transformation of antitumor acridinone C-1305 but not C-1311 via selective cellular expression of UGT1A10 increases cytotoxic response: implications for clinical use.

Monika Pawlowska, Rong Chu, Barbara Fedejko-Kap, Ewa Augustin, Zofia Mazerska, Anna Radominska-Pandya, Timothy C Chambers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Acridine as an Anti-Tumour Agent: A Critical Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika PawlowskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Chemical Faculty, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.
Rong Chu
Barbara Fedejko-Kap
Ewa Augustin
Zofia Mazerska
Anna Radominska-Pandya
Timothy C Chambers
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USGdańsk University of Technology · PL

Funding

BcL-2 Proteins in Mechanism of Anti-mitotic Drug ActionR01CA109821 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI CHAMBERS, TIMOTHY C. · 2004 to 2014
$2.3M
Structure-Function of UDP-GlucuronosyltransferasesR01GM075893 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI RADOMINSKA-PANDYA, ANNA · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA109821NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109821NIGMS NIH HHS GM075893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acridinone derivates 5-dimethylaminopropylamino-8-hydroxytriazoloacridinone (C-1305) and 5-diethylaminoethylamino-8-hydroxyimidazoacridinone (C-1311) are promising antitumor agents with high activity against several experimental cellular and tumor models and are under evaluation in preclinical and early phase clinical trials. Recent evidence from our laboratories has indicated that both compounds were conjugated by several uridine diphosphate-glucuronyltransferase (UGT) isoforms, the most active being extrahepatic UGT1A10. The present studies were designed to test the ability and selectivity of UGT1A10 in the glucuronidation of acridinone antitumor agents in a cellular context. We show that in KB-3 cells, a HeLa subline lacking expression of any UGT isoforms, both C-1305 and C-1311 undergo metabolic transformation to the glucuronidated forms on overexpression of UGT1A10. Furthermore, UGT1A10 overexpression significantly increased the cytotoxicity of C-1305, but not C-1311, suggesting that the glucuronide was more potent than the C-1305 parent compound. These responses were selective for UGT1A10 because documented overexpression of UGT2B4 failed to produce glucuronide products and failed to alter the cytotoxicity for both compounds. These findings contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of these agents and are of particular significance because data for C-1305 contradict the dogma that glucuronidation typically plays a role in detoxification or deactivation. In summary, these studies suggest that extrahepatic UGT1A10 plays an important role in the metabolism and the bioactivation of C-1305 and constitutes the basis for further mechanistic studies on the mode of action of this drug, as well as translational studies on the role of this enzyme in regulation of C-1305 toxicity in cancer.

Indexed as

AcridinesAminoacridinesAntineoplastic AgentsBiotransformationCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGlucuronidesGlucuronosyltransferaseHeLa CellsHumansInhibitory Concentration 50TransfectionTriazolesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcridinesAminoacridinesAntineoplastic Agentsbilirubin uridine-diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A10C 1305C 1311GlucuronidesGlucuronosyltransferaseTriazolesUGT2B4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23160818
PMCPMC3558869
OpenAlexW2123418981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.