Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23160475›Full record

ArticleUltrasonic imaging2012

In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images.

Haiyan Xu, Tomy Varghese, Jingfeng Jiang, James A Zagzebski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonic imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MixTURE: L1-Norm-Based Mixed Second-Order Continuity in Strain Tensor Ultrasound Elastography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haiyan XuDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Tomy Varghese
Jingfeng Jiang
James A Zagzebski

Funding

Real-time Ultrasonic Monitoring of Tumor AblationR01CA112192 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VARGHESE, TOMY · 2007 to 2017
$2.6M
Palpation ImagingR01CA100373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Feasibility of In-vivo Determination of Absolute Elastic TissueR21CA133488 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2008 to 2009
$441k
Uterine In-vivo Strain Imaging Using Saline InfusionR21CA140939 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VARGHESE, TOMY · 2009 to 2010
$359k
NCI NIH HHS 5R21CA140939-02NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100373NCI NIH HHS R01CA100373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112192NCI NIH HHS R01CA112192-05NCI NIH HHS R01CA112192-S103NCI NIH HHS R21 CA133488NCI NIH HHS R21CA133488NCI NIH HHS R21 CA140939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Early detection and accurate classification of suspicious masses as benign or malignant is important for arriving at an appropriate treatment plan. In this article, we present classification results for features extracted from ultrasound-based, axial-strain and axial-shear images of breast masses. The breast-mass stiffness contrast, size ratio, and a normalized axial-shear strain area feature are evaluated for the classification of in vivo breast masses using a leave-one-out classifier. Radiofrequency echo data from 123 patients were acquired using Siemens Antares or Elegra clinical ultrasound systems during freehand palpation. Data from four different institutions were analyzed. Axial displacements and strains were estimated using a multilevel, pyramid-based two-dimensional cross-correlation algorithm, with final processing block dimensions of 0.385 mm × 0.507 mm (three A-lines). Since mass boundaries on B-mode images for 21 patients could not be delineated (isoechoic), the combined feature analysis was only performed for 102 patients. Results from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) demonstrate that the area under the curve was 0.90, 0.84, and 0.52 for the normalized axial-shear strain, size ratio, and stiffness contrast, respectively. When these three features were combined using a leave-one-out classifier and support vector machine approach, the overall area under the curve improved to 0.93.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Mammary

Identifiers

PMID23160475
PMCPMC3662535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.