Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23160413›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

Text mining in the biocuration workflow: applications for literature curation at WormBase, dictyBase and TAIR.

Kimberly Van Auken, Petra Fey, Tanya Z Berardini, Robert Dodson, Laurel Cooper, Donghui Li, Juancarlos Chan, Yuling Li, Siddhartha Basu, Hans-Michael Muller and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Classifying domain-specific text documents containing ambiguous keywords.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine learning approach to literature mining for the genetics of complex diseases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly Van AukenDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. vanauken@caltech.edu
Petra Fey
Tanya Z Berardini
Robert Dodson
Laurel Cooper
Donghui Li
Juancarlos Chan
Yuling Li
Siddhartha Basu
Hans-Michael Muller
Rex Chisholm
Eva Huala
Paul W Sternberg
WormBase Consortium
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHERRY, J. MICHAEL, MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
Wormbase SupplementP41HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2000 to 2012
$32.0M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
WormBase: a core data resource for C. elegans and other nematodesU41HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KERSEY, PAUL, SCHEDL, TIM · 2013 to 2017
$20.5M
WormBase: a core data resource for C. elegans and other nematodesU24HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIM SCHEDL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2018 to 2026
$18.9M
Development of DictyBase, an online informatics resourceR01GM064426 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CHISHOLM, REX L · 2002 to 2019
$8.3M
GENE ONTOLOGY CONSORTIUMR01HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2001 to 2003
$5.8M
Textpresso: information retrieval and extraction system for biological literatureR01HG004090 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MULLER, HANS-MICHAEL · 2006 to 2012
$2.1M
Medical Research Council G070119NHGRI NIH HHS HG004090NHGRI NIH HHS HG02223NHGRI NIH HHS HG02273NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004090NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NIGMS NIH HHS GM64426NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064426Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WormBase, dictyBase and The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) are model organism databases containing information about Caenorhabditis elegans and other nematodes, the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum and related Dictyostelids and the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. Each database curates multiple data types from the primary research literature. In this article, we describe the curation workflow at WormBase, with particular emphasis on our use of text-mining tools (BioCreative 2012, Workshop Track II). We then describe the application of a specific component of that workflow, Textpresso for Cellular Component Curation (CCC), to Gene Ontology (GO) curation at dictyBase and TAIR (BioCreative 2012, Workshop Track III). We find that, with organism-specific modifications, Textpresso can be used by dictyBase and TAIR to annotate gene productions to GO's Cellular Component (CC) ontology.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPeriodicals as TopicWorkflowAccess to InformationAnimalsArabidopsisCaenorhabditis elegansData MiningDictyosteliumMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

PMID23160413
PMCPMC3500519
OpenAlexW2150850055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.