ArticleThe Journal of urology2013
Using the epigenetic field defect to detect prostate cancer in biopsy negative patients.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of an epigenetic assay to predict negative histopathological results in repeat prostate biopsies.The Journal of urology · 2014Trial
- Whole-genome methylation sequencing reveals distinct impact of differential methylations on gene transcription in prostate cancer.The American journal of pathology · 2013Trial
- Salvage treatments after focal therapy for prostate cancer - a comprehensive review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- DNA methylation in normal-appearing tissue associated with prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Methylation pattern of caveolin-1 in prostate cancer as potential cfDNA biomarker.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Expression of hsv1-miR-H18 and hsv2-miR-H9 as a field defect marker for detecting prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2022Article
- Epigenetic field alterations in non-tumor prostate tissues detect prostate cancer in urine.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2021Article
- Alterations in the methylome of the stromal tumour microenvironment signal the presence and severity of prostate cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2020Article
- Validation of an epigenetic field of susceptibility to detect significant prostate cancer from non-tumor biopsies.Clinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- DNA methylation in repeat negative prostate biopsies as a marker of missed prostate cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2019Article
- Screening of urine identifies PLA2G16 as a field defect methylation biomarker for prostate cancer detection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Heterogeneous patterns of DNA methylation-based field effects in histologically normal prostate tissue from cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Methylation in benign prostate and risk of disease progression in men subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer.International journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.Nature reviews. Urology · 2015Review
- Aberrant hypomethylation-mediated CD147 overexpression promotes aggressive tumor progression in human prostate cancer.Oncology reports · 2015Article
- Clinically relevant genetic characterization of prostate tumors: how close are we to the goal?Korean journal of urology · 2015Review
- The epigenetics of prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis: update on clinical applications.Current opinion in urology · 2015Review
- Prognostic DNA methylation markers for prostate cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- A panel of DNA methylation markers reveals extensive methylation in histologically benign prostate biopsy cores from cancer patients.Biomarker research · 2014Article
- Epigenetic susceptibility factors for prostate cancer with aging.The Prostate · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe determined whether a novel combination of field defect DNA methylation markers could predict the presence of prostate cancer using histologically normal transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy cores. MATERIALS AND
methodsMethylation was assessed using quantitative Pyrosequencing® in a training set consisting of 65 nontumor and tumor associated prostate tissues from University of Wisconsin. A multiplex model was generated using multivariate logistic regression and externally validated in blinded fashion in a set of 47 nontumor and tumor associated biopsy specimens from University of Washington.
resultsWe observed robust methylation differences in all genes at all CpGs assayed (p <0.0001). Regression models incorporating individual genes (EVX1, CAV1 and FGF1) and a gene combination (EVX1 and FGF1) discriminated nontumor from tumor associated tissues in the original training set (AUC 0.796-0.898, p <0.001). On external validation uniplex models incorporating EVX1, CAV1 or FGF1 discriminated tumor from nontumor associated biopsy negative specimens (AUC 0.702, 0.696 and 0.658, respectively, p <0.05). A multiplex model (EVX1 and FGF1) identified patients with prostate cancer (AUC 0.774, p = 0.001) and had a negative predictive value of 0.909. Comparison between 2 separate cores in patients in this validation set revealed similar methylation defects, indicating detection of a widespread field defect.
conclusionsA widespread epigenetic field defect can be used to detect prostate cancer in patients with histologically negative biopsies. To our knowledge this assay is unique, in that it detects alterations in nontumor cells. With further validation this marker combination (EVX1 and FGF1) has the potential to decrease the need for repeat prostate biopsies, a procedure associated with cost and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.