SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2012
Systematic review of health-related quality of life models.
Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers, 26 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
195 citing papers in PubMed, 26 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health-related quality of life domains relevant to people in Europe undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people in Europe with advanced cancer in need of palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical outcomes on health-related quality of life in rectal prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people surviving cancer in Europe.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- A COSMIN systematic review of instruments for evaluating health-related quality of life in people with Hereditary Angioedema.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- Parameters influencing health-related quality of life after severe trauma: a systematic review (part II).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life in patients with inborn errors of immunity: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Health-Related Quality of Life following Total Thyroidectomy and Lobectomy for Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Quality of life and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life scores of typically developing children and adolescents around the world: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Literature Review and Head-to-Head Comparison of Social Support and Social Constraint in Relation to the Psychological Functioning of Cancer Survivors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- The Relationship of Dyadic Coping With Emotional Functioning and Quality of the Relationship in Couples Facing Cancer-A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Pooled it
- Experience of living with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Does health coaching improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of health psychology · 2019Pooled it
- A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a "QOL-Climate" assessment framework.Ambio · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review on the influence of fear of falling on quality of life in older people: is there a role for falls?Clinical interventions in aging · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of the application of Wilson and Cleary health-related quality of life model in chronic diseases.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Pooled it
- Measuring quality of life among people living with HIV: a systematic review of reviews.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Pooled it
135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA systematic literature review was conducted to (a) identify the most frequently used health-related quality of life (HRQOL) models and (b) critique those models.
methodsOnline search engines were queried using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reviewed titles, abstracts, and then full-text articles for their relevance to this review. Then the most commonly used models were identified, reviewed in tables, and critiqued using published criteria.
resultsOf 1,602 titles identified, 100 articles from 21 countries met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used HRQOL models were: Wilson and Cleary (16%), Ferrans and colleagues (4%), or World Health Organization (WHO) (5%). Ferrans and colleagues' model was a revision of Wilson and Cleary's model and appeared to have the greatest potential to guide future HRQOL research and practice.
conclusionsRecommendations are for researchers to use one of the three common HRQOL models unless there are compelling and clearly delineated reasons for creating new models. Disease-specific models can be derived from one of the three commonly used HRQOL models. We recommend Ferrans and colleagues' model because they added individual and environmental characteristics to the popular Wilson and Cleary model to better explain HRQOL. Using a common HRQOL model across studies will promote a coherent body of evidence that will more quickly advance the science in the area of HRQOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.