Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23158654›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2012

Reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada: national data from 1932 to 2006.

James A Dickinson, Agata Stankiewicz, Cathy Popadiuk, Lisa Pogany, Jay Onysko, Anthony B Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Incidence and Survival Trends of Cervical Cancer in Khon Kaen, Thailand.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human Papillomavirus E7 and p16Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of elderly women with uterin cervical cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Time Trends for Incidence and Net Survival of Cervical Cancer in Sweden 1960-2014-A Nationwide Population-Based Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James A DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. dickinsj@ucalgary.ca
Agata Stankiewicz
Cathy Popadiuk
Lisa Pogany
Jay Onysko
Anthony B Miller
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh levels of participation in cervical screening are reported in Canada from the 1970's as a result of early uptake of the Pap smear and universal Medicare. Despite recommendations to the contrary, the programs have featured early age of initiation of screening and frequent screening intervals. Other countries have achieved successful outcomes without such features. We analyzed national data to better understand mortality and incidence trends, and their relationships to screening.

methodsThe Canadian Cancer Registry, National Cancer Incidence Reporting System, and the Canadian Vital Statistics Database were used to measure mortality and incidence rates. Cases and deaths from invasive cervical cancer were classified by 5 year age groups at diagnosis and death (15 to 19 years through to 80 to 84 years), year of diagnosis (1972 to 2006), and year of death (1932 to 2006). Probabilities of developing and dying from cervical cancer were calculated for age-specific mortality and incidence. The proportion of women reporting a timely Pap test was estimated for 1978 to 2006.

resultsCervical cancer mortality has declined steadily from a peak of 13.5 to 2.2 per 100,000 (83%,) between 1952 and 2006, and 71% between 1972 and 2006. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer has declined by 58% since 1972. These declines have occurred more among older age groups than younger. Invasive cervical cancer incidence and mortality is less in each successive birth cohort of women. Participation rates in screening are high especially in women under age 50.

conclusionsDespite increasing risk factors for cervical cancer, both incidence and mortality have declined over time, across age groups, and across birth cohorts. Earlier increasing mortality (1932 - 1950) was likely related to improved classification of cancers and the early subsequent reduction (1950 - 1970) to improved treatment. Recent improvements in incidence and mortality are likely due to high rates of screening. For women under age 30 years there are low rates of disease but lesser improvement related to screening.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMortalityPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus Infections

Identifiers

PMID23158654
PMCPMC3562530
OpenAlexW2112150498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.