ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2013
Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome.
Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Maternal obesity alters methylation level of cytosine in CpG island for epigenetic inheritance in fetal umbilical cord blood.Human genomics · 2022Article
- Genetic analysis of products of conception. Should we abandon classic karyotyping methodology?Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Cell-free Fetal RNA in the Amniotic Fluid of Vervet Monkeys (Comparative medicine · 2020Article
- Gene overexpression screen for chromosome instability in yeast primarily identifies cell cycle progression genes.Current genetics · 2019Article
- "We want to do everything": how parents represent their experiences with maternal-fetal surgery online.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018Article
- Genomic sequencing in clinical practice: applications, challenges, and opportunities.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2016Review
- Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Genome-Wide Sequencing for Prenatal Detection of Fetal Single-Gene Disorders.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015Review
- Tay-Sachs disease: current perspectives from Australia.The application of clinical genetics · 2015Review
- Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2014Review
- Placental mosaicism for Trisomy 13: a challenge in providing the cell-free fetal DNA testing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014Article
- Cellular fetal microchimerism in preeclampsia.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2013Article
- Article
- Assessing the Ethical Considerations in the Era of Advanced Prenatal Testing and Genetic Counselling - Clinicians' Perspective.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amount of genetic and genomic information obtainable from the human fetus during pregnancy is accelerating at an unprecedented rate. Two themes have dominated recent technological advances in prenatal diagnosis: interrogation of the fetal genome in increasingly high resolution and the development of non-invasive methods of fetal testing using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. These two areas of advancement have now converged with several recent reports of non-invasive assessment of the entire fetal genome from maternal blood. However, technological progress is outpacing the ability of the healthcare providers and patients to incorporate these new tests into existing clinical care, and further complicates many of the economic and ethical dilemmas in prenatal diagnosis. This review summarizes recent work in this field and discusses the integration of these new technologies into the clinic and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.