Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23158229›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2012

Effects of maternal worm infections and anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy on infant motor and neurocognitive functioning.

Margaret Nampijja, Barbara Apule, Swaib Lule, Hellen Akurut, Lawrence Muhangi, Emily L Webb, Charlie Lewis, Alison M Elliott, Katie J Alcock

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret NampijjaCo-infections Studies Programme, MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda. m.nampijja@lancaster.ac.uk
Barbara Apule
Swaib Lule
Hellen Akurut
Lawrence Muhangi
Emily L Webb
Charlie Lewis
Alison M Elliott
Katie J Alcock
Uganda Virus Research Institute · UGLancaster University · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries · UG

Funding

Wellcome Trust 064693Wellcome Trust 079110Wellcome Trust 095778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that maternal worm infections in pregnancy affect infant motor and neurocognitive development, and that anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy can reverse these effects. We used measures which examine infant motor, cognitive and executive function, including inhibition. We assessed 983 Ugandan infants aged 15 months, using locally appropriate measures within the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study, a trial of anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy. Key exposures were maternal worm infections and anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy. Effects of other health and social factors were controlled for statistically. Of the five major worm species found in the pregnant women, two had influences on the developmental measures: Maternal Mansonella perstans and Strongyloides stercoralis infections showed negative associations with the A-not B-task, and Language, respectively. Performance on other psychomotor and cognitive measures was associated with illnesses during infancy and infants' behavior during assessment, but not with maternal worm infections. There were no positive effects of maternal anthelminthic treatment on infant abilities. Mansonella perstans and Strongyloides stercoralis infection during pregnancy seem associated with impaired early executive function and language, respectively, but single-dose anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy was not beneficial. The biological mechanisms that could underlie these neurocognitive effects are discussed.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsAntiparasitic AgentsChild DevelopmentCognition DisordersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantMaleMovement DisordersParasitic DiseasesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsPsychomotor PerformanceReproducibility of ResultsAnthelminticsAntiparasitic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23158229
PMCPMC3948080
OpenAlexW2144384310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.