Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23157855›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2013

Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Agustin Conde-Agudelo, Roberto Romero, Kypros Nicolaides, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, John M O'Brien, Elcin Cetingoz, Eduardo da Fonseca, George Creasy, Priya Soma-Pillay, Shalini Fusey and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02901626 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial of Pessary in Singleton Pregnancies With a Short Cervix

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George Washington University Biostatistics CenterRan2017 to 2022Enrolled544ConditionsShort Cervix, Preterm DeliveryArmsArabin Cervical Pessary
NCT07372495 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Hospital of Obstetrics and GynecologyRan2026 to 2029Enrolled260ConditionsPretermArmsCervical cerclage, Progesterone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Role of vulvovaginal infection in women with short cervix: An observational clinical trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Agustin Conde-AgudeloPerinatology Research Branch, NICHD/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Roberto Romero
Kypros Nicolaides
Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa
John M O'Brien
Elcin Cetingoz
Eduardo da Fonseca
George Creasy
Priya Soma-Pillay
Shalini Fusey
Cetin Cam
Zarko Alfirevic
Sonia S Hassan

Funding

The Role Of Subclinical Infection And Cytokines In Preterm ParturitionZIAHD002400 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ROMERO, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2025
$254.4M
Prenatal Diagnosis Of Congenital AnomaliesZIAHD002401 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ROMERO, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2025
$81.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD002401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNo randomized controlled trial has compared vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage directly for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix in the mid trimester, singleton gestation, and previous spontaneous preterm birth. We performed an indirect comparison of vaginal progesterone vs cerclage using placebo/no cerclage as the common comparator. STUDY

designAdjusted indirect metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

resultsFour studies that evaluated vaginal progesterone vs placebo (158 patients) and 5 studies that evaluated cerclage vs no cerclage (504 patients) were included. Both interventions were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation and composite perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with placebo/no cerclage. Adjusted indirect metaanalyses did not show statistically significant differences between vaginal progesterone and cerclage in the reduction of preterm birth or adverse perinatal outcomes.

conclusionBased on state-of-the-art methods for indirect comparisons, either vaginal progesterone or cerclage are equally efficacious in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix in the mid trimester, singleton gestation, and previous preterm birth. Selection of the optimal treatment needs to consider adverse events, cost and patient/clinician preferences.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalAdministration, IntravaginalCervix UteriFemaleHumansPregnancyPremature BirthProgesteroneProgestinsUltrasonographyProgesteroneProgestins

Identifiers

PMID23157855
PMCPMC3529767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.