Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23157573›Full record

ReviewBiology of the cell2013

Optogenetic control of cell function using engineered photoreceptors.

Gopal P Pathak, Justin D Vrana, Chandra L Tucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of the cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Protein design accelerates the development and application of optogenetic tools.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Optogenetic Tools for Regulating RNA Metabolism and Functions.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Significant Advancements and Evolutions in Chimeric Antigen Receptor Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Shining a light on RhoA: Optical control of cell contractility.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Towards translational optogenetics.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gopal P PathakDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 90045, USA.
Justin D Vrana
Chandra L Tucker

Funding

Control of Protein Activity Via Light Stimulated DimerizersR01GM100225 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TUCKER, CHANDRA L · 2012 to 2019
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decades, there has been growing recognition that light can provide a powerful stimulus for biological interrogation. Light-actuated tools allow manipulation of molecular events with ultra-fine spatial and fast temporal resolution, as light can be rapidly delivered and focused with sub-micrometre precision within cells. While light-actuated chemicals such as photolabile 'caged' compounds have been in existence for decades, the use of genetically encoded natural photoreceptors for optical control of biological processes has recently emerged as a powerful new approach with several advantages over traditional methods. Here, we review recent advances using light to control basic cellular functions and discuss the engineering challenges that lie ahead for improving and expanding the ever-growing optogenetic toolkit.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLightOptogeneticsPhotoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID23157573
PMCPMC3552082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.