Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23157348›Full record

ReviewMolecular plant pathology2013

Exploitation of genomics in fungicide research: current status and future perspectives.

Hans J Cools, Kim E Hammond-Kosack

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular plant pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structured Framework and Genome Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Phenotypic analysis and genome sequence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide Expression Profiling of Small RNAs in Indian Strain ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans J CoolsDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK. hans.cools@rothamsted.ac.uk
Kim E Hammond-Kosack
Rothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000488/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every year, fungicide use to control plant disease caused by pathogenic fungi increases. The global fungicide market is now worth more than £5.3 billion, second only to the herbicide market in importance. In the UK, over 5500 tonnes of fungicide were applied to crops in 2010 (The Food and Environment Research Agency, Pesticide Usage Statistics), with 95.5% of the wheat-growing area receiving three fungicide sprays. Although dependence on fungicides to produce food securely, reliably and cheaply may be moderated in the future by further developments in crop biotechnology, modern crop protection will continue to require a diversity of solutions, including effective and safe chemical control. Therefore, investment in exploiting the increasingly available genome sequences of the most devastating fungal and oomycete phytopathogenic species should bring an array of new opportunities for chemical intervention. To date, the impact of whole genome research on the development, introduction and stewardship of fungicides has been limited, but ongoing improvements in computational analysis, molecular biology, chemical genetics, genome sequencing and transcriptomics will facilitate the development and registration of the future suite of crop protection chemicals.

Indexed as

ResearchDrug Resistance, FungalFungicides, IndustrialGenomicsFungicides, Industrial

Identifiers

PMID23157348
PMCPMC6638899
OpenAlexW2169559539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.