ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes Project exon capture sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Retrotransposons and Effective Computational Detection Methods for Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Homozygous and hemizygous CNV detection from exome sequencing data in a Mendelian disease cohort.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Tertiary Epimutations - A Novel Aspect of Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance Promoting Genome Instability.PloS one · 2016Article
- Allele-specific copy-number discovery from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Assessing copy number from exome sequencing and exome array CGH based on CNV spectrum in a large clinical cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015Article
- Natural variability of minimotifs in 1092 people indicates that minimotifs are targets of evolution.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- New insights into the performance of human whole-exome capture platforms.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Deep intronic GPR143 mutation in a Japanese family with ocular albinism.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of sperm epimutations promote genetic mutations.Epigenetics · 2015Article
- Vaccine-associated varicella and rubella infections in severe combined immunodeficiency with isolated CD4 lymphocytopenia and mutations in IL7R detected by tandem whole exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014Article
- Tangram: a comprehensive toolbox for mobile element insertion detection.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Next generation sequencing of chromosomal rearrangements in patients with split-hand/split-foot malformation provides evidence for DYNC1I1 exonic enhancers of DLX5/6 expression in humans.Journal of medical genetics · 2014Article
- Long insert whole genome sequencing for copy number variant and translocation detection.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Article
- Increased CNV-region deletions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects in the ADNI sample.Genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function.
resultsAs members of the 1000 Genomes Project analysis effort, we investigated 697 samples in which 931 genes were targeted and sampled with 454 or Illumina paired-end sequencing. We developed a rigorous Bayesian method to detect CNVs in the genes, based on read depth within target regions. Despite substantial variability in read coverage across samples and targeted exons, we were able to identify 107 heterozygous deletions in the dataset. The experimentally determined false discovery rate (FDR) of the cleanest dataset from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is 12.5%. We were able to substantially improve the FDR in a subset of gene deletion candidates that were adjacent to another gene deletion call (17 calls). The estimated sensitivity of our call-set was 45%.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that exonic sequencing datasets, collected both in population based and medical sequencing projects, will be a useful substrate for detecting genic CNV events, particularly deletions. Based on the number of events we found and the sensitivity of the methods in the present dataset, we estimate on average 16 genic heterozygous deletions per individual genome. Our power analysis informs ongoing and future projects about sequencing depth and uniformity of read coverage required for efficient detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.