Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23157288›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Copy Number Variation detection from 1000 Genomes Project exon capture sequencing data.

Jiantao Wu, Krzysztof R Grzeda, Chip Stewart, Fabian Grubert, Alexander E Urban, Michael P Snyder, Gabor T Marth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing copy number from exome sequencing and exome array CGH based on CNV spectrum in a large clinical cohort.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiantao WuBoston College, Boston, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Krzysztof R Grzeda
Chip Stewart
Fabian Grubert
Alexander E Urban
Michael P Snyder
Gabor T Marth

Funding

Robust Software Tools for Variant Identification and Functional AssessmentU01HG006513 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ABECASIS, GONCALO, MARTH, GABOR T · 2012 to 2015
$4.2M
Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencer DataR01HG004719 · NHGRI · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI MARTH, GABOR T · 2008 to 2011
$2.5M
Modular Software for Sequence Data Quality Checking Alignment & Variant-CallingRC2HG005552 · NHGRI · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI ABECASIS, GONCALO, MARTH, GABOR T · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG004719NHGRI NIH HHS RC2-HG005552NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function.

resultsAs members of the 1000 Genomes Project analysis effort, we investigated 697 samples in which 931 genes were targeted and sampled with 454 or Illumina paired-end sequencing. We developed a rigorous Bayesian method to detect CNVs in the genes, based on read depth within target regions. Despite substantial variability in read coverage across samples and targeted exons, we were able to identify 107 heterozygous deletions in the dataset. The experimentally determined false discovery rate (FDR) of the cleanest dataset from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is 12.5%. We were able to substantially improve the FDR in a subset of gene deletion candidates that were adjacent to another gene deletion call (17 calls). The estimated sensitivity of our call-set was 45%.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that exonic sequencing datasets, collected both in population based and medical sequencing projects, will be a useful substrate for detecting genic CNV events, particularly deletions. Based on the number of events we found and the sensitivity of the methods in the present dataset, we estimate on average 16 genic heterozygous deletions per individual genome. Our power analysis informs ongoing and future projects about sequencing depth and uniformity of read coverage required for efficient detection.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsBayes TheoremExomeExonsGenomeGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23157288
PMCPMC3563612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.