Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23155425›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Survival of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in the human nose after artificial inoculation.

Bibi C G C Slingerland, Mehri Tavakol, Alex J McCarthy, Jodi A Lindsay, Susan V Snijders, Jaap A Wagenaar, Alex van Belkum, Margreet C Vos, Henri A Verbrugh, Willem J B van Wamel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human Infections with Staphylococcus aureus CC398.Current environmental health reports · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Impact of livestock-associated MRSA in a hospital setting.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bibi C G C SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. b.slingerland@erasmusmc.nl
Mehri Tavakol
Alex J McCarthy
Jodi A Lindsay
Susan V Snijders
Jaap A Wagenaar
Alex van Belkum
Margreet C Vos
Henri A Verbrugh
Willem J B van Wamel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that MRSA ST398 of animal origin is only capable of temporarily occupying the human nose, and it is therefore, often considered a poor human colonizer.We inoculated 16 healthy human volunteers with a mixture of the human MSSA strain 1036 (ST931, CC8) and the bovine MSSA strain 5062 (ST398, CC398), 7 weeks after a treatment with mupirocin and chlorhexidine-containing soap. Bacterial survival was studied by follow-up cultures over 21 days. The human strain 1036 was eliminated faster (median 14 days; range 2-21 days) than the bovine strain 5062 (median 21 days; range 7-21 days) but this difference was not significant (p = 0.065). The bacterial loads were significantly higher for the bovine strain on day 7 and day 21. 4/14 volunteers (28.6%) showed elimination of both strains within 21 days. Of the 10 remaining volunteers, 5 showed no differences in bacterial counts between both strains, and in the other 5 the ST398 strain far outnumbered the human S. aureus strain. Within the 21 days of follow-up, neither human strain 1036 nor bovine strain 5062 appeared to acquire or lose any mobile genetic elements. In conclusion, S. aureus ST398 strain 5062 is capable of adequately competing for a niche with a human strain and survives in the human nose for at least 21 days.

Indexed as

AdultBacterial LoadHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoseStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID23155425
PMCPMC3498341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.