Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23154208›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2013

The specificity of urinary aquaporin 1 and perilipin 2 to screen for renal cell carcinoma.

Jeremiah J Morrissey, Evan D Kharasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Urine C-reactive protein content and non-invasive molecular grading of renal cell carcinoma.Kidney cancer journal : official journal of the Kidney Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Renal Cell Cancer and Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Renal tumor biomarkers (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremiah J MorrisseyDivision of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis (EDK), St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, USA. morrisse@wustl.edu
Evan D Kharasch
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Center for Kidney Disease ResearchP30DK079333 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMERMAN, MARC RANDALL · 2007 to 2011
$5.1M
URINARY BIOMARKERS OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMASR01CA141521 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISSEY, JEREMIAH J · 2011 to 2019
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS R01 CA141521NCI NIH HHS R01CA141521NIDDK NIH HHS DK079333NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRenal cancer is frequently asymptomatic until late stages of the disease and it has a poor prognosis when not discovered early. AQP1 and PLIN2 are recently discovered, sensitive urine biomarkers of clear cell and papillary kidney cancer. We validated these biomarkers in a second cohort of patients and determined the effect of common kidney diseases on specificity. MATERIALS AND

methodsUrine samples were obtained from 36 patients with clear cell or papillary kidney cancer, 43 controls, 44 patients with documented urinary tract infection, 24 diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy and 18 diagnosed with glomerulonephritis. Urine levels of AQP1 and PLIN2 normalized to urine creatinine were determined by a sensitive, specific Western blot procedure.

resultsCompared with controls, urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels in patients with kidney cancer were 23-fold and fourfold greater, respectively, and they decreased 83% to 84% after tumor excision. There was a linear correlation between urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels, and tumor size (each p <0.001). Urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels in patients with kidney cancer were 11 to 23-fold and 17 to 25-fold greater, respectively, than in patients with the common kidney diseases.

conclusionsThe ability of urine AQP1 and PLIN2 to identify patients with kidney cancer compared to controls was validated in a second cohort of patients. Common kidney diseases do not adversely increase urine AQP1 and PLIN2 levels or decrease their specificity to screen for renal cancer.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 1Carcinoma, Renal CellEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMembrane ProteinsPerilipin-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAquaporin 1Membrane ProteinsPerilipin-2PLIN2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23154208
PMCPMC3720141
OpenAlexW2080828572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.