Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23153834›Full record

ReviewAntiviral research2013

Traditional Chinese herbal medicine as a source of molecules with antiviral activity.

Ting Li, Tao Peng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antiviral research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Anisodus tanguticus in Cancer Research: A Review of Traditional Use, Phytochemistry, Extraction Methods, and Preclinical Antitumor Evidence.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anti-HSV-1 agents: an update.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  16. Antiviral Activity of Natural Herbs and their Isolated BioactiveCompounds: A Review.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Review
  17. Dual Effects of 3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Tao Peng
Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Chinese herbal medicine (TCHM) is widely used in the prevention and treatment of viral infectious diseases. However, the operative mechanisms of TCHM remain largely obscure, mainly because of its complicated nature and the fragmented nature of research. In recent years, systematic methodologies have been developed to discover the active compounds in TCHM and to elucidate its underlying mechanisms. In this review, we summarize recent progress in TCHM-based antiviral research in China and other Asian countries. In particular, this review focuses on progress in targeting key steps in the viral replication cycle and key cellular components of the host defense system. Recent developments in centralized and standardized TCHM screening and databases are also summarized.

Indexed as

Herbal MedicineAntiviral AgentsAsiaBiomedical ResearchHumansPlants, MedicinalVirus DiseasesAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID23153834
PMCPMC7114103
OpenAlexW1964768213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.