Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23153487›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cell2012

Chromothripsis: chromosomes in crisis.

Mathew J K Jones, Prasad V Jallepalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Telomere Crisis Shapes Cancer Evolution.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  3. The authors respond to feedback onFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Insight into the Molecular Basis Underlying Chromothripsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Many Questions about Mini Chromosomes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. ReducedCancers · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Anticancer Effects of Constituents of Herbs Targeting Osteosarcoma.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathew J K JonesMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Prasad V Jallepalli

Funding

Regulation of Chromosome Segregation in Human CellsR01GM094972 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JALLEPALLI, PRASAD V · 2010 to 2021
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM094972NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During oncogenesis, cells acquire multiple genetic alterations that confer essential tumor-specific traits, including immortalization, escape from antimitogenic signaling, neovascularization, invasiveness, and metastatic potential. In most instances, these alterations are thought to arise incrementally over years, if not decades. However, recent progress in sequencing cancer genomes has begun to challenge this paradigm, because a radically different phenomenon, termed chromothripsis, has been suggested to cause complex intra- and interchromosomal rearrangements on short timescales. In this Review, we review established pathways crucial for genome integrity and discuss how their dysfunction could precipitate widespread chromosome breakage and rearrangement in the course of malignancy.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAnimalsApoptosisChromosomal InstabilityChromosome BreakageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGene RearrangementHumansMitosisModels, GeneticMutationNeoplasmsTelomere Shortening

Identifiers

PMID23153487
PMCPMC3514072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.