Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23153308›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

First survey and functional annotation of prohormone and convertase genes in the pig.

Kenneth I Porter, Bruce R Southey, Jonathan V Sweedler, Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bioinformatics for Prohormone and Neuropeptide Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioinformatics for Prohormone and Neuropeptide Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth I PorterDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Bruce R Southey
Jonathan V Sweedler
Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUrbana University · US

Funding

The UIUC Neuroproteomics Center on Cell-Cell SignalingP30DA018310 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Elena V Romanova · 2004 to 2026
$24.9M
Integration of resources and studies to elucidate neuropeptide signalingR21DA027548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RODRIGUEZ ZAS, SANDRA L · 2009 to 2012
$961k
Discovery of exon, microRNA and clinical prognostic markers of glioblastoma surviR03CA143975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RODRIGUEZ ZAS, SANDRA L · 2009 to 2010
$152k
NCI NIH HHS 1R03CA143975NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018310NIDA NIH HHS P30DA018310NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027548NIDA NIH HHS R21DA027548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pig is a biomedical model to study human and livestock traits. Many of these traits are controlled by neuropeptides that result from the cleavage of prohormones by prohormone convertases. Only 45 prohormones have been confirmed in the pig. Sequence homology can be ineffective to annotate prohormone genes in sequenced species like the pig due to the multifactorial nature of the prohormone processing. The goal of this study is to undertake the first complete survey of prohormone and prohormone convertases genes in the pig genome. These genes were functionally annotated based on 35 gene expression microarray experiments. The cleavage sites of prohormone sequences into potentially active neuropeptides were predicted.

resultsWe identified 95 unique prohormone genes, 2 alternative calcitonin-related sequences, 8 prohormone convertases and 1 cleavage facilitator in the pig genome 10.2 assembly and trace archives. Of these, 11 pig prohormone genes have not been reported in the UniProt, UniGene or Gene databases. These genes are intermedin, cortistatin, insulin-like 5, orexigenic neuropeptide QRFP, prokineticin 2, prolactin-releasing peptide, parathyroid hormone 2, urocortin, urocortin 2, urocortin 3, and urotensin 2-related peptide. In addition, a novel neuropeptide S was identified in the pig genome correcting the previously reported pig sequence that is identical to the rabbit sequence. Most differentially expressed prohormone genes were under-expressed in pigs experiencing immune challenge relative to the un-challenged controls, in non-pregnant relative to pregnant sows, in old relative to young embryos, and in non-neural relative to neural tissues. The cleavage prediction based on human sequences had the best performance with a correct classification rate of cleaved and non-cleaved sites of 92% suggesting that the processing of prohormones in pigs is similar to humans. The cleavage prediction models did not find conclusive evidence supporting the production of the bioactive neuropeptides urocortin 2, urocortin 3, torsin family 2 member A, tachykinin 4, islet amyloid polypeptide, and calcitonin receptor-stimulating peptide 2 in the pig.

conclusionsThe present genomic and functional characterization supports the use of the pig as an effective animal model to gain a deeper understanding of prohormones, prohormone convertases and neuropeptides in biomedical and agricultural research.

Indexed as

AnimalsDatabases, GeneticEmbryo, MammalianFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomeHormonesPlacentaPregnancyProprotein ConvertasesSus scrofaHormonesProprotein Convertases

Identifiers

PMID23153308
PMCPMC3499383
OpenAlexW2062440962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.