Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Identification of plasma lipid biomarkers for prostate cancer by lipidomics and bioinformatics.

Xinchun Zhou, Jinghe Mao, Junmei Ai, Youping Deng, Mary R Roth, Charles Pound, Jeffrey Henegar, Ruth Welti, Steven A Bigler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eigenlipids for exploring lipid biology.Journal of lipid research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lipids: Driving Forces in the Underlying Biology of Carcinogenesis.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. BACE1 and SCD1 are associated with neurodegeneration.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Targeting lipid metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Xinchun ZhouDepartment of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America. xzhou@umc.edu
Jinghe Mao
Junmei Ai
Youping Deng
Mary R Roth
Charles Pound
Jeffrey Henegar
Ruth Welti
Steven A Bigler
University of Mississippi Medical Center · USKansas State University · USBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USGeorgia State University · USRush University Medical Center · USTougaloo College · US

Funding

TOUGALOO PROTEOMICSP20RR016476 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI SHEARER, GLEN · 2001 to 2011
$30.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016476NCRR NIH HHS P20RR016476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLipids have critical functions in cellular energy storage, structure and signaling. Many individual lipid molecules have been associated with the evolution of prostate cancer; however, none of them has been approved to be used as a biomarker. The aim of this study is to identify lipid molecules from hundreds plasma apparent lipid species as biomarkers for diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing lipidomics, lipid profiling of 390 individual apparent lipid species was performed on 141 plasma samples from 105 patients with prostate cancer and 36 male controls. High throughput data generated from lipidomics were analyzed using bioinformatic and statistical methods. From 390 apparent lipid species, 35 species were demonstrated to have potential in differentiation of prostate cancer. Within the 35 species, 12 were identified as individual plasma lipid biomarkers for diagnosis of prostate cancer with a sensitivity above 80%, specificity above 50% and accuracy above 80%. Using top 15 of 35 potential biomarkers together increased predictive power dramatically in diagnosis of prostate cancer with a sensitivity of 93.6%, specificity of 90.1% and accuracy of 97.3%. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) demonstrated that patient and control populations were visually separated by identified lipid biomarkers. RandomForest and 10-fold cross validation analyses demonstrated that the identified lipid biomarkers were able to predict unknown populations accurately, and this was not influenced by patient's age and race. Three out of 13 lipid classes, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), ether-linked phosphatidylethanolamine (ePE) and ether-linked phosphatidylcholine (ePC) could be considered as biomarkers in diagnosis of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Using lipidomics and bioinformatic and statistical methods, we have identified a few out of hundreds plasma apparent lipid molecular species as biomarkers for diagnosis of prostate cancer with a high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyHumansLipidsMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorLipids

Identifiers

PMID23152813
PMCPMC3495963
OpenAlexW2110571546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.