Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152799›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Preparation, biodistribution and neurotoxicity of liposomal cisplatin following convection enhanced delivery in normal and F98 glioma bearing rats.

Tianyao Huo, Rolf F Barth, Weilian Yang, Robin J Nakkula, Rumiana Koynova, Boris Tenchov, Abhik Ray Chaudhury, Lawrence Agius, Teni Boulikas, Helene Elleaume and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Rat and Mouse Brain Tumor Models for Experimental Neuro-Oncology Research.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Neurotoxicity of Nanomaterials: An Up-to-Date Overview.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  16. The neurotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. MR image-guided delivery of cisplatin-loaded brain-penetrating nanoparticles to invasive glioma with focused ultrasound.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  20. Convection enhanced delivery of cisplatin-loaded brain penetrating nanoparticles cures malignant glioma in rats.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tianyao HuoDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Rolf F Barth
Weilian Yang
Robin J Nakkula
Rumiana Koynova
Boris Tenchov
Abhik Ray Chaudhury
Lawrence Agius
Teni Boulikas
Helene Elleaume
Robert J Lee
The Ohio State University · USEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRUniversity of Malta · MT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate two novel liposomal formulations of cisplatin as potential therapeutic agents for treatment of the F98 rat glioma. The first was a commercially produced agent, Lipoplatin™, which currently is in a Phase III clinical trial for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second, produced in our laboratory, was based on the ability of cisplatin to form coordination complexes with lipid cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHEMS). The in vitro tumoricidal activity of the former previously has been described in detail by other investigators. The CHEMS liposomal formulation had a Pt loading efficiency of 25% and showed more potent in vitro cytotoxicity against F98 glioma cells than free cisplatin at 24 h. In vivo CHEMS liposomes showed high retention at 24 h after intracerebral (i.c.) convection enhanced delivery (CED) to F98 glioma bearing rats. Neurotoxicologic studies were carried out in non-tumor bearing Fischer rats following i.c. CED of Lipoplatin™ or CHEMS liposomes or their "hollow" counterparts. Unexpectedly, Lipoplatin™ was highly neurotoxic when given i.c. by CED and resulted in death immediately following or within a few days after administration. Similarly "hollow" Lipoplatin™ liposomes showed similar neurotoxicity indicating that this was due to the liposomes themselves rather than the cisplatin. This was particularly surprising since Lipoplatin™ has been well tolerated when administered intravenously. In contrast, CHEMS liposomes and their "hollow" counterparts were clinically well tolerated. However, a variety of dose dependent neuropathologic changes from none to severe were seen at either 10 or 14 d following their administration. These findings suggest that further refinements in the design and formulation of cisplatin containing liposomes will be required before they can be administered i.c. by CED for the treatment of brain tumors and that a formulation that may be safe when given systemically may be highly neurotoxic when administered directly into the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDose-Response Relationship, DrugGliomaLiposomesMaleRatsTransplantation, HomologousAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinlipoplatinLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID23152799
PMCPMC3496719
OpenAlexW2090686331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.