ArticlePloS one2012
Development and validation of a job exposure matrix for physical risk factors in low back pain.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of JEM Soignances Job-Exposure Matrix Through Comparison with Self-Reported Exposures Among Healthcare Workers in CONSTANCES.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Development of a gender-specific European job exposure matrix (EuroJEM) for physical workload and its validation against musculoskeletal pain.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a French job-exposure matrix for healthcare workers: JEM Soignances.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
- Comparison Between Musculoskeletal Pain and Gender-Specific, Non-gendered Job-Exposure Matrix and Self-reported Exposures in CONSTANCES.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Physical activity and risk of workplace and commuting injuries: a cohort study.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024Article
- An occupational mechanical job exposure index based on five Norwegian nationwide surveys of living conditions on work environment.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- The impact of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical workload on disability pension-a cohort study of Swedish men.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of the gender-specific CONSTANCES job exposure matrix for physical risk factors in France.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023Article
- Labour market trajectories after part-time sickness absence: a nationwide cohort study from Finland.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Physical Work Exposures of Older Workers: Does Measurement Make a Difference?Work, aging and retirement · 2023Article
- Working life expectancy and working years lost among users of part- and full-time sickness absence in Finland.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023Article
- Article
- Work ability and physical fitness among aging workers: the Finnish Retirement and Aging Study.European journal of ageing · 2022Article
- Constructing and validating an Occupational Mechanical Job Exposure Index based on five Norwegian nationwide Surveys of Living Conditions on work environment.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Modelling the global economic costs of tobacco product waste.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Article
- Why do men extend their employment beyond pensionable age more often than women? a cohort study.European journal of ageing · 2022Article
- The impact of musculoskeletal pain and strenuous work on self-reported physical work ability: a cohort study of Swedish men and women.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022Article
- Occupational Exposure Assessment Tools in Europe: A Comprehensive Inventory Overview.Annals of work exposures and health · 2022Review
- Associations of employment sector and occupational exposures with full and part-time sickness absence: random and fixed effects analyses on panel data.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022Article
- Physical work exposure matrix for use in the UK Biobank.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim was to construct and validate a gender-specific job exposure matrix (JEM) for physical exposures to be used in epidemiological studies of low back pain (LBP). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized two large Finnish population surveys, one to construct the JEM and another to test matrix validity. The exposure axis of the matrix included exposures relevant to LBP (heavy physical work, heavy lifting, awkward trunk posture and whole body vibration) and exposures that increase the biomechanical load on the low back (arm elevation) or those that in combination with other known risk factors could be related to LBP (kneeling or squatting). Job titles with similar work tasks and exposures were grouped. Exposure information was based on face-to-face interviews. Validity of the matrix was explored by comparing the JEM (group-based) binary measures with individual-based measures. The predictive validity of the matrix against LBP was evaluated by comparing the associations of the group-based (JEM) exposures with those of individual-based exposures.
resultsThe matrix includes 348 job titles, representing 81% of all Finnish job titles in the early 2000s. The specificity of the constructed matrix was good, especially in women. The validity measured with kappa-statistic ranged from good to poor, being fair for most exposures. In men, all group-based (JEM) exposures were statistically significantly associated with one-month prevalence of LBP. In women, four out of six group-based exposures showed an association with LBP.
conclusionsThe gender-specific JEM for physical exposures showed relatively high specificity without compromising sensitivity. The matrix can therefore be considered as a valid instrument for exposure assessment in large-scale epidemiological studies, when more precise but more labour-intensive methods are not feasible. Although the matrix was based on Finnish data we foresee that it could be applicable, with some modifications, in other countries with a similar level of technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.