Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

High uptake of HIV testing in pregnant women in Ontario, Canada.

Robert S Remis, Maraki Fikre Merid, Robert W H Palmer, Elaine Whittingham, Susan M King, Natasha S Danson, Lee Vernich, Carol Swantee, Carol Major

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal hepatitis B screening, and hepatitis B burden among children, in Ontario: a descriptive study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  4. Examination of a Canadian provincial prenatal HIV screening program: 2010 to 2014.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Factors responsible for mother-to-child HIV transmission in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2008.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert S RemisDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. rs.remis@utoronto.ca
Maraki Fikre Merid
Robert W H Palmer
Elaine Whittingham
Susan M King
Natasha S Danson
Lee Vernich
Carol Swantee
Carol Major
Public Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1999, Ontario implemented a policy to offer HIV counseling and testing to all pregnant women and undertook measures to increase HIV testing. We evaluated the effectiveness of the new policy by examining HIV test uptake, the number of HIV-infected women identified and, in 2002, the HIV rate in women not tested during prenatal care. We analyzed test uptake among women receiving prenatal care from 1999 to 2010. We examined HIV test uptake and HIV rate by year, age and health region. In an anonymous, unlinked study, we determined the HIV rate in pregnant women not tested. Prenatal HIV test uptake in Ontario increased dramatically, from 33% in the first quarter of 1999 to 96% in 2010. Test uptake was highest in younger women but increased in all age groups. All health regions improved and experienced similar test uptake in recent years. The HIV rate among pregnant women tested in 2010 was 0.13/1,000; in Toronto, the rate was 0.28 per 1,000. In the 2002 unlinked study, the HIV rate was 0.62/1,000 among women not tested in pregnancy compared to 0.31/1,000 among tested women. HIV incidence among women who tested more than once was 0.05/1,000 person-years. In response to the new policy in Ontario, prenatal HIV testing uptake improved dramatically among women in all age groups and health regions. A reminder to physicians who had not ordered a prenatal HIV test appeared to be very effective. In 2002, the HIV rate in women who were not tested was twice that of tested women: though 77% of pregnant women had been tested, only 63% of HIV-infected women were tested. HIV testing uptake was estimated at 98% in 2010.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOntarioPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23152762
PMCPMC3494693
OpenAlexW1997894407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.