Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152723›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2012

G6PD deficiency prevalence and estimates of affected populations in malaria endemic countries: a geostatistical model-based map.

Rosalind E Howes, Frédéric B Piel, Anand P Patil, Oscar A Nyangiri, Peter W Gething, Mewahyu Dewi, Mariana M Hogg, Katherine E Battle, Carmencita D Padilla, J Kevin Baird and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 338 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
43.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 564 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Tafenoquine: a toxicity overview.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Analytical dilemmas in assessing efficacy of radical cure of vivax malaria.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rosalind E HowesSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. rosalind.howes@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Frédéric B Piel
Anand P Patil
Oscar A Nyangiri
Peter W Gething
Mewahyu Dewi
Mariana M Hogg
Katherine E Battle
Carmencita D Padilla
J Kevin Baird
Simon I Hay
University of Oxford · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KEOxford University Clinical Research Unit IndonesiaUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085406Wellcome Trust 089276Wellcome Trust 091835Wellcome Trust 095066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimaquine is a key drug for malaria elimination. In addition to being the only drug active against the dormant relapsing forms of Plasmodium vivax, primaquine is the sole effective treatment of infectious P. falciparum gametocytes, and may interrupt transmission and help contain the spread of artemisinin resistance. However, primaquine can trigger haemolysis in patients with a deficiency in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDd). Poor information is available about the distribution of individuals at risk of primaquine-induced haemolysis. We present a continuous evidence-based prevalence map of G6PDd and estimates of affected populations, together with a national index of relative haemolytic risk. METHODS AND

findingsRepresentative community surveys of phenotypic G6PDd prevalence were identified for 1,734 spatially unique sites. These surveys formed the evidence-base for a Bayesian geostatistical model adapted to the gene's X-linked inheritance, which predicted a G6PDd allele frequency map across malaria endemic countries (MECs) and generated population-weighted estimates of affected populations. Highest median prevalence (peaking at 32.5%) was predicted across sub-Saharan Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Although G6PDd prevalence was generally lower across central and southeast Asia, rarely exceeding 20%, the majority of G6PDd individuals (67.5% median estimate) were from Asian countries. We estimated a G6PDd allele frequency of 8.0% (interquartile range: 7.4-8.8) across MECs, and 5.3% (4.4-6.7) within malaria-eliminating countries. The reliability of the map is contingent on the underlying data informing the model; population heterogeneity can only be represented by the available surveys, and important weaknesses exist in the map across data-sparse regions. Uncertainty metrics are used to quantify some aspects of these limitations in the map. Finally, we assembled a database of G6PDd variant occurrences to inform a national-level index of relative G6PDd haemolytic risk. Asian countries, where variants were most severe, had the highest relative risks from G6PDd.

conclusionsG6PDd is widespread and spatially heterogeneous across most MECs where primaquine would be valuable for malaria control and elimination. The maps and population estimates presented here reflect potential risk of primaquine-associated harm. In the absence of non-toxic alternatives to primaquine, these results represent additional evidence to help inform safe use of this valuable, yet dangerous, component of the malaria-elimination toolkit. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyHemolysisAntimalarialsBayes TheoremFemaleGeographic MappingGeography, MedicalGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansMalariaMaleModels, GeneticPrevalencePrimaquineRisk AssessmentAntimalarialsGlucosephosphate DehydrogenasePrimaquine

Identifiers

PMID23152723
PMCPMC3496665
OpenAlexW2137935465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.