Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152548›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of WHO-endorsed phenotypic drug susceptibility testing methods for first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs.

David J Horne, Lancelot M Pinto, Matthew Arentz, S-Y Grace Lin, Edward Desmond, Laura L Flores, Karen R Steingart, Jessica Minion

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Open-access genomic drug resistance prediction tools forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Concordance of Drug-resistance Profiles Between Persons With Drug-resistant Tuberculosis and Their Household Contacts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Clonal spread of Mycobacterium monacense strains among patients with extrapulmonary mycobacteriosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Outcomes of WHO-conforming, longer, all-oral multidrug-resistant TB regimens and analysis implications.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. DisputedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David J HorneDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. dhorne@u.washington.edu
Lancelot M Pinto
Matthew Arentz
S-Y Grace Lin
Edward Desmond
Laura L Flores
Karen R Steingart
Jessica Minion
University of Washington · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USMcGill University · CARegina Qu'Appelle Health Region · CAUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an effort to update and clarify policies on tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing (DST), the World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned a systematic review evaluating WHO-endorsed diagnostic tests. We report the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of phenotypic DST for first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs. This review provides support for recommended critical concentrations for isoniazid and rifampin in commercial broth-based systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate critical concentrations for ethambutol and streptomycin that accurately detect susceptibility to these drugs. Evidence is limited on the performance of DST for pyrazinamide and second-line drugs.

Indexed as

Microbial Sensitivity TestsAntitubercular AgentsHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisWorld Health OrganizationAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID23152548
PMCPMC3553871
OpenAlexW2094879924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.