Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152450›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

Obligate ligation-gated recombination (ObLiGaRe): custom-designed nuclease-mediated targeted integration through nonhomologous end joining.

Marcello Maresca, Victor Guosheng Lin, Ning Guo, Yi Yang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Light-Triggered CRISPR/Cas12a for Genomic Editing and Tumor Regression.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcello MarescaDevelopmental & Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Victor Guosheng Lin
Ning Guo
Yi Yang
Pathways Behavioral Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Custom-designed nucleases (CDNs) greatly facilitate genetic engineering by generating a targeted DNA double-strand break (DSB) in the genome. Once a DSB is created, specific modifications can be introduced around the breakage site during its repair by two major DNA damage repair (DDR) mechanisms: the dominant but error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, and the less-frequent but precise homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Here we describe ObLiGaRe, a new method for site-specific gene insertions that uses the efficient NHEJ pathway and acts independently of HR. This method is applicable with both zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and Tale nucleases (TALENs), and has enabled us to insert a 15-kb inducible gene expression cassette at a defined locus in human cell lines. In addition, our experiments have revealed the previously underestimated error-free nature of NHEJ and provided new tools to further characterize this pathway under physiological and pathological conditions.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairMutagenesis, InsertionalRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCell Line, TumorDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEndonucleasesGene Expression RegulationGenetic EngineeringGenetic LociGenome, HumanHCT116 CellsHumansMiceZinc FingersEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID23152450
PMCPMC3589542
OpenAlexW2163090183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.