SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012
Methadone for chronic non-cancer pain in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Morphine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Methadone for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Intraoperative methadone for postoperative pain in adult patients undergoing tonsillectomy-a randomised controlled trial.BJA open · 2025Article
- Article
- Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- High-dose opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Treatment of painful calciphylaxis with methadone in a palliative care unit: A case report.Clinical nephrology. Case studies · 2023Article
- Methadone for Pain Management: A Pharmacotherapeutic Review.CNS drugs · 2020Review
- Methadone vs. morphine SR for treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial and the challenges in recruitment.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2019Article
- Time to initiate randomized controlled clinical trials with methadone in cancer patients.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Out-of-hospital mortality among patients receiving methadone for noncancer pain.JAMA internal medicine · 2015Article
- What we know, and don't know, about the impact of state policy and systems-level interventions on prescription drug overdose.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2014Review
- Opioid and chronic non-cancer pain.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
- Article
- Central Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury.Critical reviews in physical and rehabilitation medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethadone belongs to a class of analgesics known as opioids, that are considered the cornerstone of therapy for moderate-to-severe pain due to life-threatening illnesses; however, their use in chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is controversial. Methadone has many characteristics that differentiate it from other opioids, which suggests that it may have a different efficacy and safety profile.
objectivesTo assess the analgesic effectiveness and safety of methadone in the treatment of CNCP. SEARCH
methodsWe identified both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of methadone use in chronic pain by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library 2011, issue 11, MEDLINE (1950 to November 2011), and EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs with pain assessment as either the primary or secondary outcome. Quasi-randomized studies, cohorts and case-control trials were also considered for inclusion because we suspected that the beneficial and harmful effects of methadone in CNCP may not be adequately addressed in RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted efficacy and adverse event data and assessed risk of bias. MAIN
resultsWe included two RCTs and one non-randomized study, involving a total of 181 participants. Both RCTs were cross-over studies, one involving 19 participants with diverse neuropathic pain syndromes, the other involving 76 participants with postherpetic neuralgia. Study phases were 20 days and approximately eight weeks, respectively. The non-randomized study retrospectively evaluated 86 outpatients over an average of 8.8 ± 6.3 months.One RCT reported average pain intensity and pain relief, and found statistically significant improvements versus placebo for both outcomes, with 10 mg and 20 mg daily doses of methadone. The second RCT reported differences in pain reduction between methadone and morphine and found morphine to be statistically superior. The non-randomized study found that in patients initially prescribed methadone it was effective in fewer participants than in those initially prescribed other long-acting opioids (28% versus 42%, 33% and 50% for morphine, oxycodone and transdermal fentanyl, respectively).One RCT compared incidences for several individual adverse events, but found a difference between methadone and placebo for only one event, dizziness (P = 0.041). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe three studies provide very limited evidence of the efficacy of methadone for CNCP, and there were too few data for pooled analysis of efficacy or harm, or to have confidence in the results of the individual studies. No conclusions can be made regarding differences in efficacy or safety between methadone and placebo, other opioids, or other treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.