Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23152077›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2013

Management of parastomal varices: who re-bleeds and who does not? A systematic review of the literature.

M O Pennick, D Y Artioukh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of parastomal variceal bleeding with endoscopic ultrasound-guided coiling and human thrombin/fibrinogen injection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bleeding parastomal varices.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ectopic Stomal Varices in Chronic Liver Disease.ACG case reports journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Management of Ostomy-Related Varices.Clinical liver disease · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Current Management of Intestinal Stomas and Their Complications.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M O PennickDepartment of Surgery, Southport and Ormskirk Hospital, Town Lane, Southport, Merseyside, PR8 6PN, UK.
D Y Artioukh
Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although first described almost half a century ago, parastomal varices are not easily recognised as a cause of stomal bleeding even though they occur in up to 5% of all people who have a stoma. The main challenges associated with this condition are diagnosis and management. For that reason, the aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all the available literature pertaining to this topic. The primary end point was recurrent variceal haemorrhage after a particular mode of management. Several secondary endpoints focused on means of diagnosis and pathological conditions of abdominal organs that could contribute to both the formation of these varices and the rate of re-bleeding. Sixty-six articles comprising 210 patients were analysed. Parastomal varices tend to be more frequent in men manifesting with bleeding in the fifth decade of life. The majority (72.0%) of patients who bleed from parastomal varices do so from an ileostomy. The most common pathology leading to stoma formation is ulcerative colitis (57.8%). Liver cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension leading to the development of parastomal varices and primary sclerosing cholangitis is in second place. A third of patients with parastomal varices also have co-existent oesophageal varices. There are no pathognomonic symptoms or signs of parastomal varices and only the minority of patients have a raspberry appearance of the stoma, visibly dilated submucosal veins and bluish discoloration and hyperkeratosis of the skin around it. Venous phase contrast angiography or portal venography is the most successful radiological investigation to confirm the diagnosis. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has the highest success rate in preventing recurrent haemorrhage and local measures, either non-operative or surgical, are the least effective. Comparison of TIPS with non-operative and local surgical treatment groups produced a risk reduction in 4.60 and 3.85, respectively. Treatment of 1.37 people with a TIPS procedure prevents one person suffering from recurrent variceal bleeding and using TIPS can reduce the likelihood of re-bleeding by 78.5%. Surgical portosystemic shunting or embolisation alone leaves patients with approximately 50% chance of re-bleeding. Although TIPS has gained popularity over the last two decades almost three quarters of patients with parastomal varices are still treated with local measures as first-line management. Liver transplantation as a treatment of the primary cause of parastomal varices remains very rare.

Indexed as

ColostomyIleostomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColitis, UlcerativeComorbidityEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleHemorrhageHumansLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID23152077
OpenAlexW2076703585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.