Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151790›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2012

Sialyl Lewis x expression in cervical scrapes of premalignant lesions.

Noé Velázquez-Márquez, Gerardo Santos-López, Lucio Jiménez-Aranda, Julio Reyes-Leyva, Verónica Vallejo-Ruiz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noé Velázquez-MárquezLaboratorio de Biologia Molecular y Virologia, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica de Oriente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Km 4.5 Carretera Federal Atlixco-Metepec, Atlixco, Puebla, Mexico C.P. 74360.
Gerardo Santos-López
Lucio Jiménez-Aranda
Julio Reyes-Leyva
Verónica Vallejo-Ruiz
Mexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sialylated oligosaccharides of glycoproteins and glycolipids have been implicated in tumour progression and metastases. Altered expression of glycosidic antigens has been reported in cervical cancer. In cervix premalignant lesions, an increased expression of sialic acid has been reported. In the present study we determined the expression profiles of the glycosidic antigens Tn, sialyl Tn (sTn), Lewis a (Lea), sialyl Lewis a (sLea), Lewis x (Lex) and sialyl Lewis x (sLex) in cervical scrapes with cytological diagnoses of normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL) and highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL). Cervical scrapings were collected to detect tumour antigens expressions by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies. Cytometry analysis of Tn, sTn, Lea and Lex did not reveal differences at the expression level among groups. The number of positive cells to sLea antigen increased in the HGSIL group with respect to the normal group (p=0.0495). The number of positive cells to sLex antigen in the samples increased with respect to the grade of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) (p less than 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). The intensity of expression of this antigen increased in the HGSIL samples with respect to normal samples (p less than 0.0068). sLex antigen could be a candidate to be used as biomarker for the early diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriFemaleFlow CytometryHumansOligosaccharidesPrecancerous ConditionsSialyl Lewis X AntigenUterine Cervical NeoplasmsOligosaccharidesSialyl Lewis X Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23151790
OpenAlexW2008063497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.