Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151773›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2013

Persistent environmental pollutants and couple fecundity: the LIFE study.

Germaine M Buck Louis, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Enrique F Schisterman, Anne M Sweeney, Courtney D Lynch, Robert E Gore-Langton, José Maisog, Sungduk Kim, Zhen Chen, Dana B Barr

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Male Infertility in the XXI Century: Are Obesogens to Blame?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Germaine M Buck LouisDivision of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, USA. louisg@mail.nih.gov
Rajeshwari Sundaram
Enrique F Schisterman
Anne M Sweeney
Courtney D Lynch
Robert E Gore-Langton
José Maisog
Sungduk Kim
Zhen Chen
Dana B Barr
National Institutes of Health · USEmmes (United States) · USEmory University · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Statistical Modeling of Human FecundityZIAHD008883 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SUNDARAM, RAJESHWARI · 2009 to 2025
$3.6M
Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the EnvironmentZIAHD008770 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SUNDARAM, RAJESHWARI · 2009 to 2025
$2.2M
DETERMINANTS OF MALE AND FEMALE FECUNDITY AND FERTILITY RESEARCH SITES-275033356N01HD033356 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · 2004 to 2005
–
DETERMINANTS OF MALE AND FEMALE FECUNDITY AND FERTILITY DATA COORDINAT-275033358N01HD033358 · NICHD · THE EMMES CORPORATION · 2004 to 2005
–
NICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-3-3355NICHD NIH HHS N01-HD-3-3356NICHD NIH HHS N0H-HD-3-3358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggesting that persistent environmental pollutants may be reproductive toxicants underscores the need for prospective studies of couples for whom exposures are measured.

objectivesWe examined the relationship between selected persistent pollutants and couple fecundity as measured by time to pregnancy.

methodsA cohort of 501 couples who discontinued contraception to become pregnant was prospectively followed for 12 months of trying to conceive or until a human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test confirmed pregnancy. Couples completed daily journals on lifestyle and provided biospecimens for the quantification of 9 organochlorine pesticides, 1 polybrominated biphenyl, 10 polybrominated diphenyl ethers, 36 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and 7 perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in serum. Using Cox models for discrete time, we estimated fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% CIs separately for each partner's concentrations adjusting for age, body mass index, serum cotinine, serum lipids (except for PFCs), and study site (Michigan or Texas); sensitivity models were further adjusted for left truncation or time off of contraception (≤ 2 months) before enrollment.

resultsThe adjusted reduction in fecundability associated with standard deviation increases in log-transformed serum concentrations ranged between 18% and 21% for PCB congeners 118, 167, 209, and perfluorooctane sulfonamide in females; and between 17% and 29% for p,p´-DDE and PCB congeners 138, 156, 157, 167, 170, 172, and 209 in males. The strongest associations were observed for PCB 167 (FOR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.97) in females and PCB 138 (FOR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.98) in males.

conclusionsIn this couple-based prospective cohort study with preconception enrollment and quantification of exposures in both female and male partners, we observed that a subset of persistent environmental chemicals were associated with reduced fecundity.

Indexed as

FertilityEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedMalePregnancySexual PartnersEnvironmental PollutantsHydrocarbons, Chlorinated

Identifiers

PMID23151773
PMCPMC3569685
OpenAlexW1513271034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.