Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151579›Full record

ReviewNature2012

How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption.

Almut Schulze, Adrian L Harris

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 497 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
497citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

497 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Metabolic Control of Membrane Lipid Asymmetry in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stimuli-Responsive Supramolecular Biomaterials for Cancer Theranostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Harnessing cuproptosis: a new avenue for targeted cancer therapies.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Hypoxia Imaging as a Radiomics Signature in Tumors Using NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

437 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Almut SchulzeGene Expression Analysis Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3LY, UK. almut.schulze@cancer.org.uk
Adrian L Harris

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11359Department of Health NF-SI-0611-10163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer metabolism has received a substantial amount of interest over the past decade. The advances in analytical tools have, along with the rapid progress of cancer genomics, generated an increasingly complex understanding of metabolic reprogramming in cancer. As numerous connections between oncogenic signalling pathways and metabolic activities emerge, the importance of metabolic reprogramming in cancer is being increasingly recognized. The identification of metabolic weaknesses of cancer cells has been used to create strategies for treating cancer, but there are still challenges to be faced in bringing the drugs that target cancer metabolism to the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationHumansLipidsMitochondriaNeoplasmsOncogenesSignal TransductionTumor Suppressor ProteinsLipidsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23151579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.