Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151451›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2012

Clinical trial in healthy malaria-naïve adults to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and efficacy of MuStDO5, a five-gene, sporozoite/hepatic stage Plasmodium falciparum DNA vaccine combined with escalating dose human GM-CSF DNA.

Thomas L Richie, Yupin Charoenvit, Ruobing Wang, Judith E Epstein, Richard C Hedstrom, Sanjai Kumar, Thomas C Luke, Daniel A Freilich, Joao C Aguiar, John B Sacci and 25 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A DNA Vaccine EncodingVaccines · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [Development of malaria vaccines-state of the art].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas L RichieNaval Medical Research Center; Silver Spring, MD, USA. Thomas.Richie@med.navy.mil
Yupin Charoenvit
Ruobing Wang
Judith E Epstein
Richard C Hedstrom
Sanjai Kumar
Thomas C Luke
Daniel A Freilich
Joao C Aguiar
John B Sacci
Martha Sedegah
Ronald A Nosek
Patricia De La Vega
Mara P Berzins
Victoria F Majam
Esteban N Abot
Harini Ganeshan
Nancy O Richie
Jo Glenna Banania
Maria Fe B Baraceros
Tanya G Geter
Robin Mere
Lolita Bebris
Keith Limbach
Bradley W Hickey
David E Lanar
Jennifer Ng
Meng Shi
Peter M Hobart
Jon A Norman
Lorraine A Soisson
Michael R Hollingdale
William O Rogers
Denise L Doolan
Stephen L Hoffman
Naval Medical Research Command · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USVical (United States) · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USNational Marrow Donor Program · USPan American Health Organization (Cuba) · CUUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When introduced in the 1990s, immunization with DNA plasmids was considered potentially revolutionary for vaccine development, particularly for vaccines intended to induce protective CD8 T cell responses against multiple antigens. We conducted, in 1997-1998, the first clinical trial in healthy humans of a DNA vaccine, a single plasmid encoding Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP), as an initial step toward developing a multi-antigen malaria vaccine targeting the liver stages of the parasite. As the next step, we conducted in 2000-2001 a clinical trial of a five-plasmid mixture called MuStDO5 encoding pre-erythrocytic antigens PfCSP, PfSSP2/TRAP, PfEXP1, PfLSA1 and PfLSA3. Thirty-two, malaria-naïve, adult volunteers were enrolled sequentially into four cohorts receiving a mixture of 500 μg of each plasmid plus escalating doses (0, 20, 100 or 500 μg) of a sixth plasmid encoding human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (hGM-CSF). Three doses of each formulation were administered intramuscularly by needle-less jet injection at 0, 4 and 8 weeks, and each cohort had controlled human malaria infection administered by five mosquito bites 18 d later. The vaccine was safe and well-tolerated, inducing moderate antigen-specific, MHC-restricted T cell interferon-γ responses but no antibodies. Although no volunteers were protected, T cell responses were boosted post malaria challenge. This trial demonstrated the MuStDO5 DNA and hGM-CSF plasmids to be safe and modestly immunogenic for T cell responses. It also laid the foundation for priming with DNA plasmids and boosting with recombinant viruses, an approach known for nearly 15 y to enhance the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of DNA vaccines.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, ProtozoanFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMalaria VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedPlasmidsPlasmodium falciparumSporozoitesVaccines, DNAYoung AdultAntigens, ProtozoanGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMalaria VaccinesVaccines, DNAclinical trialscontrolled human malaria infectionDNA vaccineGM-CSFmalariamalaria challengemalaria vaccinePlasmodium falciparumvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID23151451
PMCPMC3601132
OpenAlexW2011406504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.