Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151325›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2012

A survey on infection management practices in Italian ICUs.

Matteo Bassetti, Raffaele De Gaudio, Teresita Mazzei, Giulia Morace, Nicola Petrosillo, Pierluigi Viale, Giuseppe Bello, Sofia La Face, Massimo Antonelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic use in Brazilian hospitals in the 21st century: a systematic review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo Bassetti
Raffaele De Gaudio
Teresita Mazzei
Giulia Morace
Nicola Petrosillo
Pierluigi Viale
Giuseppe Bello
Sofia La Face
Massimo Antonelli
University of Florence · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITMisericordia University · USPfizer (Italy) · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn online survey was conducted to characterize current infection management practices in Italian intensive care units (ICUs), including the antibacterial and antifungal drug regimens prescribed for various types of infections.

methodsDuring February and March 2011, all 450 ICUs in public hospitals in Italy were invited to take part in an online survey. The questionnaire focused on ICU characteristics, methods used to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections, and antimicrobials prescribing policies. The frequency of each reported practice was calculated as a percentage of the total number of units answering the question. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 38.8% (175 of the 450 ICUs contacted) with homogeneous distribution across the country and in terms of unit type.

resultsEighty-eight percent of the responding facilities performed periodical surveillance cultures on all patients. In 71% of patients, cultures were also collected on admission. Endotracheal/bronchial aspirates were the most frequently cultured specimens at both time points. Two-thirds of the responding units had never performed screening cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Around 67% of the ICUs reported the use of antimicrobial de-escalation strategies during the treatment phase. In general, the use of empirical antimicrobial drug regimens was appropriate. Although the rationale for the choice was not always clearly documented, the use of a combination therapy was preferred over antibiotic monotherapy. The preferred first-line agents for invasive candidiasis were fluconazole and an echinocandin (64% and 25%, respectively). Two-thirds of the ICUs monitored vancomycin serum levels and administered it by continuous infusion in 86% of cases. For certain antibiotics, reported doses were too low to ensure effective treatment of severe infections in critically ill patients; conversely, inappropriately high doses were administered for certain antifungal drugs.

conclusionsAlthough infection control policies and management practices are generally appropriate in Italian ICUs, certain aspects, such as the extensive use of multidrug empirical regimens and the inappropriate antimicrobial dosing, deserve careful management and closer investigation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsCross InfectionDrug Administration ScheduleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfection ControlInfectionsIntensive Care UnitsItalyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMycosesStaphylococcal InfectionsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID23151325
PMCPMC3672600
OpenAlexW2121997153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.