Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23151006›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2012

Experts' opinions on terminology for complementary and integrative medicine - a qualitative study with leading experts.

Christine Holmberg, Benno Brinkhaus, Claudia Witt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Complementary and integrative interventions for PTSD.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Opportunities and challenges associated with health service research of complementary medicine in France: response to Braillon.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonias with integrative medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Women's Sleep Disorders: Integrative Care.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Christine HolmbergInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Luisenstr 57, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Benno Brinkhaus
Claudia Witt
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrative medicine (IM) is currently the most commonly used term to describe the integration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into conventional medicine. In the definitions of IM the most important feature is the focus on evidence as crucial factor for therapeutic decision-making. However, there are discussions on the term "integrative medicine" with the most notable critique from within CAM that it describes the integration of complementary methods into conventional institutions and into a "conventional framework of thinking". The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the thoughts of leading experts on IM and on the scientific debate in the field as well as their personal opinions about terminology in general.

methodsWe have conducted semi-standardized interviews with ten leading experts in the field of CAM and integrative medicine in the USA, England, and Germany, who have had leading positions at medical schools or the NIH in 2010 and 2011. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using content analysis with the qualitative analysis software maxqda.

resultsOverall the current terminology was seen as a problem, although most experts agreed that the term "integrative medicine" (IM) described well what they do or they think is useful for medical care. The terminology debate was discussed from four perspectives: 1) from the perspective of medical practice, 2) from the perspective of research, 3) from the perspective of public relations, and 4) from the perspective of health care delivery. These perspectives may be used to evaluate the appropriateness of different terms in use in the field. When interviewees discussed the terminology question, they also discussed the type of health care system they envisioned. Such reflections led the interviewees to caution about too narrow a focus on the terminology question. The question of naming was one about influencing and changing medicine.

conclusionThe discussion of the experts demonstrated that the discussion about terminology is an important debate about the shaping of medicine. The experts discussed terminology in the light of "how health care systems" should look like in the future.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelComplementary TherapiesDelivery of Health CareIntegrative MedicineTerminology as TopicEnglandGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Public RelationsQualitative ResearchResearchSchools, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23151006
PMCPMC3522550
OpenAlexW2011365938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.