Trial reportBMC geriatrics2012
Feasibility of evidence-based diagnosis and management of heart failure in older people in care: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic burden of heart failure in Europe: A systematic review of costs and cost-effectiveness.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacist- and Nurse-Led Medical Optimization in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiac failure · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Optimal effectiveness of heart failure management - an umbrella review of meta-analyses examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce (re)hospitalizations in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of primary care involvement and setting on multidisciplinary heart failure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Disease management interventions for heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nurse-led titration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and angiotensin receptor blockers for people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Heart failure in nursing homes: A scoping review of educational interventions for optimising care provision.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Route to heart failure diagnosis in English primary care: a retrospective cohort study of variation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Enhancing Knowledge and InterProfessional care for Heart Failure (EKWIP-HF) in long-term care: a pilot study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany older people in long-term care do not receive evidence-based diagnosis or management for heart failure; it is not known whether this can be achieved for this population. We initiated an onsite heart failure service, compared with 'usual care' with the aim of establishing the feasibility of accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.
methodsA pilot randomised controlled trial which randomised residents from 33 care facilities in North-East England with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) to usual care or an onsite heart failure service. The primary outcome was the optimum prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenergic antagonists at 6 months.
resultsOf 399 echocardiographically-screened residents aged 65-100 years, 30 subjects with LVSD were eligible; 28 (93%) consented and were randomised (HF service: 16; routine care: 12). Groups were similar at baseline; six month follow-up was completed for 25 patients (89%); 3 (11%) patients died. Results for the primary outcome were not statistically significant but there was a consistent pattern of increased drug use and titration to optimum dose in the intervention group (21% compared to 0% receiving routine care, p=0.250). Hospitalisation rates, quality of life and mortality at 6 months were similar between groups.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the feasibility of an on-site heart failure service for older long-term care populations. Optimisation of medication appeared possible without adversely affecting quality of life; this questions clinicians' concerns about adverse effects in this group. This has international implications for managing such patients. These methods should be replicated in a large-scale study to quantify the scale of benefit.
trial registrationISRCTN19781227 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN19781227
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.