Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23150765›Full record

ArticleGenes & cancer2012

Mdm2 in evolution.

David P Lane, Chandra Verma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nucleolar stress: From development to cancer.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mdm2: Open questions.Cancer science · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exon 3 of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  13. P53 and Apoptosis in the Drosophila Model.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  14. Anatomy of Mdm2 and Mdm4 in evolution.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MDM2's social network.Oncogene · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David P Lanep53Lab (ASTAR), Singapore.
Chandra Verma
A*STAR Graduate Academy · SGBioinformatics Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the presence, in the invertebrates, of genes related in sequence and function to the vertebrate p53 family has been known since the discovery of the fly Drosophila melanogaster Dmp53 and the worm Caenorhabditis elegans cep-1 gene, the failure to discover homologs of the essential vertebrate negative regulator of p53 Mdm2 in these species led to the false assumption that Mdm2 was only present in vertebrates. Very recently, clear homologs of Mdm2 have been discovered in a wide range of invertebrate species, raising a series of interesting questions about the evolution of the p53 pathway. Here, a personal account of the discovery of Mdm2-like genes in the Placozoa and Arthropoda is used to speculate on aspects of the evolution, structure, and function of the p53 pathway.

Indexed as

E3 ligaseevolutioninvertebrateMdm2p53 interactionRING domain

Identifiers

PMID23150765
PMCPMC3494368
OpenAlexW2160652283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.