Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23150604›Full record

ArticleGenetics2013

Captured segment exchange: a strategy for custom engineering large genomic regions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Jack R Bateman, Michael F Palopoli, Sarah T Dale, Jennifer E Stauffer, Anita L Shah, Justine E Johnson, Conor W Walsh, Hanna Flaten, Christine M Parsons

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Speciation and adaptation research meets genome editing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Assessment ofJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome engineering: Drosophila melanogaster and beyond.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack R BatemanBiology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA. jbateman@bowdoin.edu
Michael F Palopoli
Sarah T Dale
Jennifer E Stauffer
Anita L Shah
Justine E Johnson
Conor W Walsh
Hanna Flaten
Christine M Parsons
Bowdoin College · US

Funding

The Maine Biomedical Research Network (INBRE)P20GM103423 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI Dustin Lynn Updike · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
WNT SIGNALING IN THE DEVELOPING GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTP20RR016463 · NCRR · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI WRAY, CHRISTOPHER C · 2001 to 2011
$41.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR016463-12NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016463NIGMS NIH HHS 8 P20 GM103423-12NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-specific recombinases (SSRs) are valuable tools for manipulating genomes. In Drosophila, thousands of transgenic insertions carrying SSR recognition sites have been distributed throughout the genome by several large-scale projects. Here we describe a method with the potential to use these insertions to make custom alterations to the Drosophila genome in vivo. Specifically, by employing recombineering techniques and a dual recombinase-mediated cassette exchange strategy based on the phiC31 integrase and FLP recombinase, we show that a large genomic segment that lies between two SSR recognition-site insertions can be "captured" as a target cassette and exchanged for a sequence that was engineered in bacterial cells. We demonstrate this approach by targeting a 50-kb segment spanning the tsh gene, replacing the existing segment with corresponding recombineered sequences through simple and efficient manipulations. Given the high density of SSR recognition-site insertions in Drosophila, our method affords a straightforward and highly efficient approach to explore gene function in situ for a substantial portion of the Drosophila genome.

Indexed as

Gene TargetingGenome, InsectMutagenesis, InsertionalAnimalsDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsIntegrasesMutagenesis, Site-DirectedRepressor ProteinsDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDrosophila ProteinsFLP recombinaseIntegrasesRepressor ProteinsSite-specific recombinasetsh protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID23150604
PMCPMC3567733
OpenAlexW2128033196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.