Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23150533›Full record

ReviewNeurology2012

Parkinson disease and driving: an evidence-based review.

Alexander M Crizzle, Sherrilene Classen, Ergun Y Uc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Occupational Therapy Interventions for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living for Adults With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive Self-Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2024
    Article
  7. Cognition and Activity of Daily Living Function in people with Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The functional relevance of visuospatial processing speed across the lifespan.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023
    Article
  10. Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander M CrizzleDepartments of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. acrizzle@sympatico.ca
Sherrilene Classen
Ergun Y Uc

Funding

Predicting Driver Safety in Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS044930 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI UC, ERGUN Y · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing literature on driving in Parkinson disease (PD) has shown that driving is impaired in PD compared to healthy comparison drivers. PD is a complex neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor, cognitive, and visual impairments, all of which can affect fitness to drive. In this review, we examined studies of driving performance (on-road tests and simulators) in PD for outcome measures and their predictors. We searched through various databases and found 25 (of 99) primary studies, all published in English. Using the American Academy of Neurology criteria, a study class of evidence was assigned (I-IV, I indicating the highest level of evidence) and recommendations were made (Level A: predictive or not; B: probably predictive or not; C: possibly predictive or not; U: no recommendations). From available Class II and III studies, we identified various cognitive, visual, and motor measures that met different levels of evidence (usually Level B or C) with respect to predicting on-road and simulated driving performance. Class I studies reporting Level A recommendations for definitive predictors of driving performance in drivers with PD are needed by policy makers and clinicians to develop evidence-based guidelines.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingPsychomotor PerformanceDatabases, FactualEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeuropsychological TestsParkinson DiseaseVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID23150533
PMCPMC3511919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.