Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23149695›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2012

Study of the DNA damage checkpoint using Xenopus egg extracts.

Jeremy Willis, Darla DeStephanis, Yogin Patel, Vrushab Gowda, Shan Yan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tools for Decoding Ubiquitin Signaling in DNA Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. DNA Damage Response in Xenopus laevis Cell-Free Extracts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Xenbase: Facilitating the Use ofFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Emerin induces nuclear breakage inMolecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Chemical Screening Using Cell-FreeCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. APE2 Zf-GRF facilitates 3'-5' resection of DNA damage following oxidative stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy WillisDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA.
Darla DeStephanis
Yogin Patel
Vrushab Gowda
Shan Yan
University of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

Role of TopBP1 partner WDR18 in DNA damage checkpoint and DNA replicationR15GM101571 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI YAN, SHAN · 2012 to 2012
$297k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM101571NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM101571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On a daily basis, cells are subjected to a variety of endogenous and environmental insults. To combat these insults, cells have evolved DNA damage checkpoint signaling as a surveillance mechanism to sense DNA damage and direct cellular responses to DNA damage. There are several groups of proteins called sensors, transducers and effectors involved in DNA damage checkpoint signaling (Figure 1). In this complex signaling pathway, ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) is one of the major kinases that can respond to DNA damage and replication stress. Activated ATR can phosphorylate its downstream substrates such as Chk1 (Checkpoint kinase 1). Consequently, phosphorylated and activated Chk1 leads to many downstream effects in the DNA damage checkpoint including cell cycle arrest, transcription activation, DNA damage repair, and apoptosis or senescence (Figure 1). When DNA is damaged, failing to activate the DNA damage checkpoint results in unrepaired damage and, subsequently, genomic instability. The study of the DNA damage checkpoint will elucidate how cells maintain genomic integrity and provide a better understanding of how human diseases, such as cancer, develop. Xenopus laevis egg extracts are emerging as a powerful cell-free extract model system in DNA damage checkpoint research. Low-speed extract (LSE) was initially described by the Masui group. The addition of demembranated sperm chromatin to LSE results in nuclei formation where DNA is replicated in a semiconservative fashion once per cell cycle. The ATR/Chk1-mediated checkpoint signaling pathway is triggered by DNA damage or replication stress. Two methods are currently used to induce the DNA damage checkpoint: DNA damaging approaches and DNA damage-mimicking structures. DNA damage can be induced by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, γ-irradiation, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), mitomycin C (MMC), 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO), or aphidicolin. MMS is an alkylating agent that inhibits DNA replication and activates the ATR/Chk1-mediated DNA damage checkpoint. UV irradiation also triggers the ATR/Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. The DNA damage-mimicking structure AT70 is an annealed complex of two oligonucleotides poly-(dA)70 and poly-(dT)70. The AT70 system was developed in Bill Dunphy's laboratory and is widely used to induce ATR/Chk1 checkpoint signaling. Here, we describe protocols (1) to prepare cell-free egg extracts (LSE), (2) to treat Xenopus sperm chromatin with two different DNA damaging approaches (MMS and UV), (3) to prepare the DNA damage-mimicking structure AT70, and (4) to trigger the ATR/Chk1-mediated DNA damage checkpoint in LSE with damaged sperm chromatin or a DNA damage-mimicking structure.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell-Free SystemCheckpoint Kinase 1ChromatinDNAFemaleMaleMitomycinOvumProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSpermatozoaTissue ExtractsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAtr protein, XenopusCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanChek1 protein, XenopusChromatinDNAMitomycinProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTissue ExtractsXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23149695
PMCPMC3514051
OpenAlexW2155239779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.