Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23149580›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2013

Evaluation of rK-39 strip test using urine for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in an endemic region of India.

Dharmendra Singh, Krishna Pandey, Vidya Nand Rabi Das, Sushmita Das, Neena Verma, Alok Ranjan, Sekhar Chandra Lal, Kamal Roshan Topno, Shubhankar Kumar Singh, Rakesh Bihari Verma and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dharmendra SinghDepartment of Molecular Biology, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (Indian Council of Medical Research), Agamkuan, Patna, Bihar, India. singhd72@yahoo.co.in
Krishna Pandey
Vidya Nand Rabi Das
Sushmita Das
Neena Verma
Alok Ranjan
Sekhar Chandra Lal
Kamal Roshan Topno
Shubhankar Kumar Singh
Rakesh Bihari Verma
Ashish Kumar
Abul Hasan Sardar
Bidyut Purkait
Pradeep Das
Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definitive diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) requires invasive procedures for demonstration of parasites in tissue smear or culture. These procedures need expertise and laboratory supports and cannot be performed in the field. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the existing rK-39 immunochromatographic nitrocellulose strips test (ICT) with some modification in human urine for diagnosis of VL. The test was performed on both sera and urine samples on the same 786 subjects (365 confirmed VL and 421 control subjects). The sensitivity of the rK-39 ICT in serum was 100%, whereas the specificity was 93.8%, 100%, and 96.2% in healthy controls from endemic, non-endemic, and other infectious diseases, respectively. However, in urine samples, the test showed 96.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Considering sensitivity and feasibility of the test in the field, rK-39 ICT using urine samples can be an alternative to conventional invasive VL diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ProtozoanCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolChromatography, AffinityFemaleHumansIndiaLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID23149580
PMCPMC3583308
OpenAlexW2139352861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.