Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23149010›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2012

Materials to clinical devices: technologies for remotely triggered drug delivery.

Brian P Timko, Daniel S Kohane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An Intravascular Magnetic Catheter Enables the Retrieval of Nanoagents from the Bloodstream.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioactive Polymeric Materials for Tissue Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Light-responsive nanoparticle depot to control release of a small molecule angiogenesis inhibitor in the posterior segment of the eye.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Near-infrared-actuated devices for remotely controlled drug delivery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian P TimkoLaboratory for Biomaterials and Drug Delivery, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Daniel S Kohane

Funding

Prolonged Duration Local AnesthesiaR01GM073626 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, DANIEL S · 2006 to 2018
$4.7M
A Photo-triggered on-demand drug delivery system for chronic painF32GM096546 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIMKO, BRIAN PAUL · 2011 to 2012
$101k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM096546NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM096546NIGMS NIH HHS GM073626NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnologies in which a remote trigger is used to release drug from an implanted or injected device could enable on-demand release profiles that enhance therapeutic effectiveness or reduce systemic toxicity. A number of new materials have been developed that exhibit sensitivity to light, ultrasound, or electrical or magnetic fields. Delivery systems that incorporate these materials might be triggered externally by the patient, parent or physician to provide flexible control of dose magnitude and timing.

objectivesTo review injectable or implantable systems that are candidates for translation to the clinic, or ones that have already undergone clinical trials. Also considered are applicability in pediatrics and prospects for the future of drug delivery systems.

methodsWe performed literature searches of the PubMed and Science Citation Index databases for articles in English that reported triggerable drug delivery devices, and for articles reporting related materials and concepts.

resultsApproaches to remotely-triggered systems that have clinical potential were identified. Ideally, these systems have been engineered to exhibit controlled on-state release kinetics, low baseline leak rates, and reproducible dosing across multiple cycles.

conclusionsAdvances in remotely-triggered drug delivery have been brought about by the convergence of numerous scientific and engineering disciplines, and this convergence is likely to play an important part in the current trend to develop systems that provide more than one therapeutic modality. Preclinical systems must be carefully assessed for biocompatibility, and engineered to ensure pharmacokinetics within the therapeutic window. Future drug delivery systems may incorporate additional modalities, such as closed-loop sensing or onboard power generation, enabling more sophisticated drug delivery regimens.

Indexed as

Remote Sensing TechnologyAnimalsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Delivery SystemsDrug ImplantsEquipment DesignHumansInjectionsMagneticsNanotechnologyPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsTechnology, PharmaceuticalTemperatureUltrasonicsUltraviolet RaysDrug ImplantsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23149010
PMCPMC3500532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.