ReviewClinical therapeutics2012
Summary of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-best pharmaceuticals for Children Act Pediatric Formulation Initiatives Workshop-Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System Working Group.
Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Pediatric Relative Bioavailability/Bioequivalence Database and Identification of Putative Risk Factors Associated With Evaluation of Pediatric Oral Products.The AAPS journal · 2021Pooled it
- Opportunities in the translational pipeline for pediatric brain cancer therapies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- In-vitro Evaluation of p-Sulfonatocalix[n] arenes (SCnA) as Novel Excipients Using a Vectorized BCS Approach.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Adult and pediatric physiologically-based biopharmaceutics modeling to explain lamotrigine immediate release absorption process.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Personalizing atomoxetine dosing in children with ADHD: what can we learn from current supporting evidence.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Review
- Age and gender-specific reference intervals for a panel of lysophosphatidylcholines estimated by tandem mass spectrometry in dried blood spots.Practical laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Paediatric emergency department dog bite attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic: an audit at a tertiary children's hospital.BMJ paediatrics open · 2021Article
- The best pharmaceuticals for children-what can we do?Translational pediatrics · 2020Article
- Availability of Authorizations from EMA and FDA for Age-Appropriate Medicines Contained in the WHO Essential Medicines List for Children 2019.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Classification of WHO Essential Oral Medicines for Children Applying a Provisional Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Mind the Gaps: Ontogeny of Human Brain P-gp and Its Impact on Drug Toxicity.The AAPS journal · 2019Review
- Biopharmaceutical optimization in neglected diseases for paediatric patients by applying the provisional paediatric biopharmaceutical classification system.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Effects of activated carbonExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Investigating Oral Absorption of Carbamazepine in Pediatric Populations.The AAPS journal · 2017Article
- A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Ganciclovir and Its Prodrug Valganciclovir in Adults and Children.The AAPS journal · 2016Article
- Pediatric Biopharmaceutical Classification System: Using Age-Appropriate Initial Gastric Volume.The AAPS journal · 2016Article
- Assessment of Age-Related Changes in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Solubility.Pharmaceutical research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) allows compounds to be classified based on their in vitro solubility and intestinal permeability. The BCS has found widespread use in the pharmaceutical community to be an enabling guide for the rational selection of compounds, formulation for clinical advancement, and generic biowaivers. The Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System (PBCS) Working Group was convened to consider the possibility of developing an analogous pediatric-based classification system. Because there are distinct developmental differences that can alter intestinal contents, volumes, permeability, and potentially biorelevant solubilities at different ages, the PBCS Working Group focused on identifying age-specific issues that need to be considered in establishing a flexible, yet rigorous PBCS.
objectiveWe summarized the findings of the PBCS Working Group and provided insights into considerations required for the development of a PBCS.
methodsThrough several meetings conducted both at The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health, Human Development-US Pediatric Formulation Initiative Workshop (November 2011) and via teleconferences, the PBCS Working Group considered several high-level questions that were raised to frame the classification system. In addition, the PBCS Working Group identified a number of knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to develop a rigorous PBCS.
resultsIt was determined that for a PBCS to be truly meaningful, it needs to be broken down into several different age groups that account for developmental changes in intestinal permeability, luminal contents, and gastrointestinal (GI) transit. Several critical knowledge gaps were identified, including (1) a lack of fully understanding the ontogeny of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters along the GI tract, in the liver, and in the kidney; (2) an incomplete understanding of age-based changes in the GI, liver, and kidney physiology; (3) a clear need to better understand age-based intestinal permeability and fraction absorbed required to develop the PBCS; (4) a clear need for the development and organization of pediatric tissue biobanks to serve as a source for ontogenic research; and (5) a lack of literature published in age-based pediatric pharmacokinetics to build physiologically- and population-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) databases.
conclusionsTo begin the process of establishing a PBPK model, 10 pediatric therapeutic agents were selected (based on their adult BCS classifications). These agents should be targeted for additional research in the future. The PBCS Working Group also identified several areas where greater emphasis on research was needed to enable the development of a PBCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.