Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23149009›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2012

Summary of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-best pharmaceuticals for Children Act Pediatric Formulation Initiatives Workshop-Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System Working Group.

Susan M Abdel-Rahman, Gordon L Amidon, Ajay Kaul, Viera Lukacova, Alexander A Vinks, Gregory T Knipp, Members of the BCS Task Force

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Effects of activated carbonExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Susan M Abdel-RahmanDivision of Pediatric Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Gordon L Amidon
Ajay Kaul
Viera Lukacova
Alexander A Vinks
Gregory T Knipp
Members of the BCS Task Force
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USSimulations Plus (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HD999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) allows compounds to be classified based on their in vitro solubility and intestinal permeability. The BCS has found widespread use in the pharmaceutical community to be an enabling guide for the rational selection of compounds, formulation for clinical advancement, and generic biowaivers. The Pediatric Biopharmaceutics Classification System (PBCS) Working Group was convened to consider the possibility of developing an analogous pediatric-based classification system. Because there are distinct developmental differences that can alter intestinal contents, volumes, permeability, and potentially biorelevant solubilities at different ages, the PBCS Working Group focused on identifying age-specific issues that need to be considered in establishing a flexible, yet rigorous PBCS.

objectiveWe summarized the findings of the PBCS Working Group and provided insights into considerations required for the development of a PBCS.

methodsThrough several meetings conducted both at The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health, Human Development-US Pediatric Formulation Initiative Workshop (November 2011) and via teleconferences, the PBCS Working Group considered several high-level questions that were raised to frame the classification system. In addition, the PBCS Working Group identified a number of knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to develop a rigorous PBCS.

resultsIt was determined that for a PBCS to be truly meaningful, it needs to be broken down into several different age groups that account for developmental changes in intestinal permeability, luminal contents, and gastrointestinal (GI) transit. Several critical knowledge gaps were identified, including (1) a lack of fully understanding the ontogeny of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters along the GI tract, in the liver, and in the kidney; (2) an incomplete understanding of age-based changes in the GI, liver, and kidney physiology; (3) a clear need to better understand age-based intestinal permeability and fraction absorbed required to develop the PBCS; (4) a clear need for the development and organization of pediatric tissue biobanks to serve as a source for ontogenic research; and (5) a lack of literature published in age-based pediatric pharmacokinetics to build physiologically- and population-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) databases.

conclusionsTo begin the process of establishing a PBPK model, 10 pediatric therapeutic agents were selected (based on their adult BCS classifications). These agents should be targeted for additional research in the future. The PBCS Working Group also identified several areas where greater emphasis on research was needed to enable the development of a PBCS.

Indexed as

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)PediatricsTerminology as TopicAdolescentAge FactorsAgingBiomedical ResearchBiotransformationChemistry, PharmaceuticalChildChild, PreschoolGastrointestinal TractHumansInfantInfant, NewbornModels, BiologicalPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23149009
PMCPMC3534959
OpenAlexW2136969177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.