Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23148875›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2013

Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs.

A F A Pires, J A Funk, C A Bolin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiological Study onMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  6. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  7. Identifying ActiveAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2018
    Article
  13. Time course ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Association between thermal environment and Salmonella in fecal samples from dairy cattle in midwestern United States.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A F A PiresDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. afapires11@gmail.com
J A Funk
C A Bolin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 3-year longitudinal study was conducted on a multi-site farrow-to-finish production system. For each of 18 cohorts at three finishing sites, 50 pigs were randomly selected. Faecal samples were collected every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. Salmonella was cultured from 453 (6·6%) of 6836 faecal samples. The pig-level incidence of Salmonella was 20·8% (187/899 pigs). Salmonella prevalence varied between cohorts and within pigs. The adjusted Salmonella prevalence decreased over the finishing period from 6·4% to 0·8%. Intermittent detection of Salmonella was found in more than 50% of pigs that were positive at more than one collection. The finding that the majority of pigs shed intermittently has implications for surveillance and research study design when determining Salmonella status. The variability in shedding over time, as well as between and within cohorts and pigs suggests that there may be time-variant risk factors for Salmonella shedding in swine.

Indexed as

Bacterial SheddingAnimalsAnimals, DomesticCarrier StateFecesIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesPrevalenceSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSwine

Identifiers

PMID23148875
PMCPMC9151394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.