Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23148343›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

General practitioner experience and perception of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) care pathways: a multimethod research study.

Saba Hinrichs, Matthew Owens, Valerie Dunn, Ian Goodyer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07399106 (EN-CAMHS 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07399106 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

EN-CAMHS 2: Enhancing CAMHS Referrals

TypeobservationalSponsorGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustRan2026 to 2026Enrolled235ConditionsNo Conditions, Improving Referrals Into NHS CAMHSArmsWork Package 1, Work Package 2, Work Package 3, Work Package 4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perspectives of young people who access support for mental health in primary care: a systematic review of their experiences and needs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Barriers to managing child and adolescent mental health problems: a systematic review of primary care practitioners' perceptions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Experiences of general practitioners in supporting the mental health of children and young people: An exploratory qualitative study in the United Kingdom.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Young people who have fallen through the mental health transition gap: a qualitative study on primary care support.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. GPs' experiences of children with anxiety disorders in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saba HinrichsDepartment of Engineering, Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew Owens
Valerie Dunn
Ian Goodyer

Funding

Department of Health 06/05/01Department of Health 97/29/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a pilot study with the objective of investigating general practitioner (GP) perceptions and experiences in the referral of mentally ill and behaviourally disturbed children and adolescents.

designQuantitative analyses on patient databases were used to ascertain the source of referrals into Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and identify the relative contribution from GP practices. Qualitative semistructured interviews were then used to explore challenges faced by GPs in referring to CAMHS.

settingGPs were chosen from the five localities that deliver CAMHS within the local Trust (Peterborough City, Fenland, Huntingdon, Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire).

participantsFor the quantitative portion, data involving 19 466 separate referrals were used. Seven GPs took part in the qualitative interviews.

resultsThe likelihood of a referral from GPs being rejected by CAMHS was over three times higher compared to all other referral sources combined within the Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust. Interviews showed that detecting the signs and symptoms of mental illness in young people is a challenge for GPs. Communication with referral agencies varies and depends on individual relationships. GPs determine whether to refer on a mixture of the presenting conditions and their perceived likelihood of acceptance by CAMHS; the criteria for the latter were poorly understood by the interviewed GPs.

conclusionsThere are longstanding structural weaknesses in the services for children and young people in general, reflected in poor multiagency cooperation at the primary care level. GP-friendly guidelines and standards are required that will aid in decision-making and help with understanding the referrals process. We look to managers of both commissioning and providing organisations, as well as future research, to drive forward the development of tools, protocols, and health service structures to help aid the recognition and treatment of mental illness in young people.

Identifiers

PMID23148343
PMCPMC3533003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.