Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147990›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013

High-throughput identification of putative receptors for cancer-binding peptides using biopanning and microarray analysis.

Daniel J Ferraro, Sandeep R Bhave, Rama P Kotipatruni, Jeremy C Hunn, Scott A Wildman, Charles Hong, David Y A Dadey, Lincoln K Muhoro, Jerry J Jaboin, Dinesh Thotala and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Application of Phage-Displayed Peptides in Tumor Imaging Diagnosis and Targeting Therapy.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J FerraroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 4511 Forest Park, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Sandeep R Bhave
Rama P Kotipatruni
Jeremy C Hunn
Scott A Wildman
Charles Hong
David Y A Dadey
Lincoln K Muhoro
Jerry J Jaboin
Dinesh Thotala
Dennis E Hallahan
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
X-ray Targeted Therapeutic Genes within NanoparticlesR01CA125757 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HALLAHAN, DENNIS E · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS #P30 CA91842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125757NCI NIH HHS R01-CA125757NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage-display peptide biopanning has been successfully used to identify cancer-targeting peptides in multiple models. For cancer-binding peptides, identification of the peptide receptor is necessary to demonstrate the mechanism of action and to further optimize specificity and target binding. The process of receptor identification can be slow and some peptides may turn out to bind ubiquitous proteins not suitable for further drug development. In this report, we describe a high-throughput method for screening a large number of peptides in parallel to identify peptide receptors, which we have termed "reverse biopanning." Peptides can then be selected for further development based on their receptor. To demonstrate this method, we screened a library of 39 peptides previously identified in our laboratory to bind specifically to cancers after irradiation. The reverse biopanning process identified 2 peptides, RKFLMTTRYSRV and KTAKKNVFFCSV, as candidate ligands for the protein tax interacting protein 1 (TIP-1), a protein previously identified in our laboratory to be expressed in tumors and upregulated after exposure to ionizing radiation. We used computational modeling as the initial method for rapid validation of peptide-TIP-1 binding. Pseudo-binding energies were calculated to be -360.645 kcal mol(-1), -487.239 kcal mol(-1), and -595.328 kcal mol(-1) for HVGGSSV, TTRYSRV, and NVFFCSV respectively, suggesting that the peptides would have at least similar, if not stronger, binding to TIP-1 compared to the known TIP-1 binding peptide HVGGSSV. We validated peptide binding in vitro using electrophoretic mobility shift assay, which showed strong binding of RKFLMTTRYSRV and the truncated form TTRYSRV. This method allows for the identification of many peptide receptors and subsequent selection of peptides for further drug development based on the peptide receptor.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorPeptidesProtein Array AnalysisProtein Interaction MappingReceptors, PeptidePeptide LibraryPeptidesReceptors, Peptide

Identifiers

PMID23147990
PMCPMC3823383
OpenAlexW2023539328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.