Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147738›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Mupirocin and chlorhexidine resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in patients with community-onset skin and soft tissue infections.

Stephanie A Fritz, Patrick G Hogan, Bernard C Camins, Ali J Ainsworth, Carol Patrick, Madeline S Martin, Melissa J Krauss, Marcela Rodriguez, Carey-Ann D Burnham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Colonization with antiseptic tolerantInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2024
    Article
  13. Increasing usage of chlorhexidine in health care settings: blessing or curse? A narrative review of the risk of chlorhexidine resistance and the implications for infection prevention and control.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessing the Potential for Unintended Microbial Consequences of Routine Chlorhexidine Bathing for Prevention of Healthcare-associated Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie A FritzDepartments of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Patrick G Hogan
Bernard C Camins
Ali J Ainsworth
Carol Patrick
Madeline S Martin
Melissa J Krauss
Marcela Rodriguez
Carey-Ann D Burnham
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2)KL2RR024994 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$8.6M
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ERADICATION OF MRSA IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDRENR01HS021736 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRITZ, STEPHANIE ANN · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
TRANSMISSION DYNAMICS OF CA-MRSA AMONG HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS AND THE HOME ENVIRONMENTK23AI091690 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRITZ, STEPHANIE ANN · 2011 to 2014
$506k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021736AHRQ HHS R01-HS021736NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024994NCRR NIH HHS KL2-RR024994NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024992NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI091690NIAID NIH HHS K23-AI091690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decolonization measures, including mupirocin and chlorhexidine, are often prescribed to prevent Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-level mupirocin and chlorhexidine resistance in S. aureus strains recovered from patients with SSTI before and after mupirocin and chlorhexidine administration and to determine whether carriage of a mupirocin- or chlorhexidine-resistant strain at baseline precluded S. aureus eradication. We recruited 1,089 patients with community-onset SSTI with or without S. aureus colonization. In addition to routine care, 483 patients were enrolled in a decolonization trial: 408 received intranasal mupirocin (with or without antimicrobial baths), and 258 performed chlorhexidine body washes. Patients were followed for up to 12 months with repeat colonization cultures. All S. aureus isolates were tested for high-level mupirocin and chlorhexidine resistance. At baseline, 23/1,089 (2.1%) patients carried a mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strain and 10/1,089 (0.9%) patients carried chlorhexidine-resistant S. aureus. Of 4 patients prescribed mupirocin, who carried a mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strain at baseline, 100% remained colonized at 1 month compared to 44% of the 324 patients without mupirocin resistance at baseline (P = 0.041). Of 2 patients prescribed chlorhexidine, who carried a chlorhexidine-resistant S. aureus strain at baseline, 50% remained colonized at 1 month compared to 48% of the 209 patients without chlorhexidine resistance at baseline (P = 1.0). The overall prevalence of mupirocin and chlorhexidine resistance is low in S. aureus isolates recovered from outpatients, but eradication efforts were less successful in patients carrying a mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strain at baseline.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateChildChild, PreschoolChlorhexidineCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDisinfectantsDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansInfantMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlorhexidineDisinfectantsMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID23147738
PMCPMC3535967
OpenAlexW2119215074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.