Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147658›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2013

New treatments for IBS.

Magnus Halland, Nicholas J Talley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Early experience with a low FODMAP diet in Asian patients with irritable bowel syndrome.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. miR-16 and miR-103 impact 5-HTScientific reports · 2017
    Article
  7. Board Review Vignette: Irritable Bowel Syndrome.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Magnus HallandUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Nicholas J Talley
University of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IBS is a common disorder that affects approximately 5-20% of the populations of Western countries; the main symptoms are abdominal pain and erratic, altered bowel habits, often accompanied by bloating. Despite an array of available pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments aimed at a wide variety of gastrointestinal and brain targets, many patients do not report adequate symptom relief. The effect of IBS on an individual can be enormous, and the societal and financial costs overall are high, which is indicative of an unmet need for effective IBS treatments. Intense research efforts are ongoing that range from the development of new molecules for pharmacological therapies to testing the utility of internet technology to facilitate widespread delivery of efficacious behavioural therapy. This Review discusses the latest treatments for IBS, including novel nonpharmacological and pharmacological approaches. We have included estimates of the number needed to treat and the number needed to harm for selected treatments. Emerging and potential future treatments are included, with the data supporting an optimistic view about the future of IBS therapeutics. The ability to optimize therapy by individualizing management whilst also avoiding harm remains the key to achieving the best possible outcomes with currently available therapeutics.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23147658
OpenAlexW2071674990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.