Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147650›Full record

ArticleStem cell research2013

Mesenchymal stem cells can improve anal pressures after anal sphincter injury.

Levilester Salcedo, Maritza Mayorga, Margot Damaser, Brian Balog, Robert Butler, Marc Penn, Massarat Zutshi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cell therapy to improve regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Faecal incontinence: Current knowledges and perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Levilester SalcedoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Maritza Mayorga
Margot Damaser
Brian Balog
Robert Butler
Marc Penn
Massarat Zutshi
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFecal incontinence reduces the quality of life of many women but has no long-term cure. Research on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies has shown promising results. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate functional recovery after treatment with MSCs in two animal models of anal sphincter injury.

methodsSeventy virgin female rats received a sphincterotomy (SP) to model episiotomy, a pudendal nerve crush (PNC) to model the nerve injuries of childbirth, a sham SP, or a sham PNC. Anal sphincter pressures and electromyography (EMG) were recorded after injury but before treatment and 10 days after injury. Twenty-four hours after injury, each animal received either 0.2 ml saline or 2 million MSCs labelled with green fluorescing protein (GFP) suspended in 0.2 ml saline, either intravenously (IV) into the tail vein or intramuscularly (IM) into the anal sphincter.

resultsMSCs delivered IV after SP resulted in a significant increase in resting anal sphincter pressure and peak pressure, as well as anal sphincter EMG amplitude and frequency 10 days after injury. MSCs delivered IM after SP resulted in a significant increase in resting anal sphincter pressure and anal sphincter EMG frequency but not amplitude. There was no improvement in anal sphincter pressure or EMG with in animals receiving MSCs after PNC. GFP-labelled cells were not found near the external anal sphincter in MSC-treated animals after SP.

conclusionMSC treatment resulted in significant improvement in anal pressures after SP but not after PNC, suggesting that MSCs could be utilized to facilitate recovery after anal sphincter injury.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnal CanalAnimalsCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalElectromyographyFecal IncontinenceFemaleMesenchymal Stem CellsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyPressurePudendal NerveRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID23147650
PMCPMC4770907
OpenAlexW2005099534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.