Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147599›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2013

Relationship between pediatric blood and marrow transplant center volume and day +100 mortality: Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium experience.

D S Taylor, M Dharmar, E Urquhart-Scott, R Ryan, M A Pulsipher, A Gamis, K Schultz, J P Marcin

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D S TaylorDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis Children's Hospital, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. douglas.taylor@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
M Dharmar
E Urquhart-Scott
R Ryan
M A Pulsipher
A Gamis
K Schultz
J P Marcin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients receiving a BMT is currently being used as a factor in the accreditation process in determining whether a center can provide a high-quality BMT. Such criteria particularly impact pediatric BMT centers as most of them perform a relatively small number of BMTs. To determine whether patient volume is a valid marker of pediatric BMT center's capabilities, the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) evaluated data from its registry to define the relationship between a pediatric transplant center's patient volume and day +100 mortality. The analyses evaluated 2575 transplants from 60 centers reporting to the PBMTC between the years 2002 and 2004. The volume-outcome relationship was evaluated while adjusting for 46 independent data categories divided between nine variables that were known- or suspected-mortality risk factors. We found no association between transplant center volume and day +100 mortality in several analyses. A calculated intraclass correlation coefficient also indicated that differences in individual transplant center volume contributed to only 1% of the variance in day +100 mortality within the PBMTC. The results of this study suggest that factors other than transplant center volume contribute to variation in day +100 mortality among pediatric patients.

Indexed as

AccreditationHospitals, PediatricRegistriesAdolescentBone Marrow TransplantationChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23147599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.