Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23147217›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

An insertion in the catalytic trigger loop gates the secondary channel of RNA polymerase.

Ran Furman, Oleg V Tsodikov, Yuri I Wolf, Irina Artsimovitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptional Responses to ppGpp and DksA.Annual review of microbiology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. TraR directly regulates transcription initiation by mimicking the combined effects of the global regulators DksA and ppGpp.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ran FurmanDepartment of Microbiology and The Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Oleg V Tsodikov
Yuri I Wolf
Irina Artsimovitch
The Ohio State University · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Mechnanism of transcript elongation control by RfaHR01GM067153 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI IRINA ARTSIMOVITCH · 2003 to 2026
$8.0M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli DksA and GreB bind to RNA polymerase (RNAP), reaching inside the secondary channel, with similar affinities but have different cellular functions. DksA destabilizes promoter complexes whereas GreB facilitates RNA cleavage in arrested elongation complexes (ECs). Although the less abundant GreB may not interfere with DksA regulation during initiation, reports that DksA acts during elongation and termination suggest that it may exclude GreB from arrested complexes, potentially triggering genome instability. Here, we show that GreB does not compete with DksA during termination whereas DksA, even when present in several hundredfold molar excess, does not inhibit GreB-mediated cleavage of the nascent RNA. Our findings that DksA does not bind to backtracked or active ECs provide an explanation for the lack of DksA activity on most ECs that we reported previously, raising a question of what makes a transcription complex susceptible to DksA. Structural modeling suggests that i6, an insertion in the catalytic trigger loop, hinders DksA access into the channel, restricting DksA action to a subset of transcription complexes. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrate that deletion of i6 permits DksA binding to ECs and that the distribution of DksA and i6 in bacterial genomes is strongly concordant. We hypothesize that DksA binds to transcription complexes in which i6 becomes mobile, for example, as a consequence of weakened RNAP interactions with the downstream duplex DNA.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialModels, MolecularModels, StructuralMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRNA, BacterialRNA CleavageSequence AlignmentSequence DeletionTranscriptional Elongation FactorsdksA protein, E coliDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGreB protein, E coliRNA, BacterialTranscriptional Elongation Factors

Identifiers

PMID23147217
PMCPMC5522729
OpenAlexW2014148312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.