Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23146662›Full record

ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2013

Comparison of transcriptional response to phorbol ester, bryostatin 1, and bryostatin analogs in LNCaP and U937 cancer cell lines provides insight into their differential mechanism of action.

N Kedei, A Telek, A M Michalowski, M B Kraft, W Li, Y B Poudel, A Rudra, M E Petersen, G E Keck, P M Blumberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Fluorescent Bryostatin Analogues.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N KedeiLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. kedein@mail.nih.gov
A Telek
A M Michalowski
M B Kraft
W Li
Y B Poudel
A Rudra
M E Petersen
G E Keck
P M Blumberg
University of Utah · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanism of Action of Phorbol EsterZIABC005270 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BLUMBERG, PETER · 2009 to 2018
$18.4M
Texas Tech Center for Translational Research and Rural Health - Research Capacity CoreU54MD020892 · NIMHD · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI Jonathan Singer · 2026 to 2026
$10.0M
CHIRAL APPROACHES TO NATURAL PRODUCT SYNTHESISR01GM028961 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KECK, GARY E · 1985 to 2014
$5.5M
MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF ACTION OF PHORBOL ESTER TUMOR PROMOTERSZ01BC005270 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BLUMBERG, PETER · 1996 to 2008
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC005270Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC005270NIGMS NIH HHS GM28961NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028961NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD020892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bryostatin 1, like the phorbol esters, binds to and activates protein kinase C (PKC) but paradoxically antagonizes many but not all phorbol ester responses. Previously, we have compared patterns of biological response to bryostatin 1, phorbol ester, and the bryostatin 1 derivative Merle 23 in two human cancer cell lines, LNCaP and U937. Bryostatin 1 fails to induce a typical phorbol ester biological response in either cell line, whereas Merle 23 resembles phorbol ester in the U937 cells and bryostatin 1 in the LNCaP cells. Here, we have compared the pattern of their transcriptional response in both cell lines. We examined by qPCR the transcriptional response as a function of dose and time for a series of genes regulated by PKCs. In both cell lines bryostatin 1 differed primarily from phorbol ester in having a shorter duration of transcriptional modulation. This was not due to bryostatin 1 instability, since bryostatin 1 suppressed the phorbol ester response. In both cell lines Merle 23 induced a pattern of transcription largely like that of phorbol ester although with a modest reduction at later times in the LNCaP cells, suggesting that the difference in biological response of the two cell lines to Merle 23 lies downstream of this transcriptional regulation. For a series of bryostatins and analogs which ranged from bryostatin 1-like to phorbol ester-like in activity on the U937 cells, the duration of transcriptional response correlated with the pattern of biological activity, suggesting that this may provide a robust platform for structure activity analysis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBryostatinsCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMolecular StructurePhorbol EstersProtein Kinase CAntineoplastic Agentsbryostatin 1BryostatinsPhorbol EstersProtein Kinase C

Identifiers

PMID23146662
PMCPMC3553297
OpenAlexW2039759444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.